Vegepygmy
First Post
Agreed. And note that most area effect spells aren't subject to fireball's special targeting rules, anyway.Hypersmurf said:The situation shown is not one that would cause any difficulty for a fireball placement.
Agreed. And note that most area effect spells aren't subject to fireball's special targeting rules, anyway.Hypersmurf said:The situation shown is not one that would cause any difficulty for a fireball placement.
SgtHulka said:Shocking Grasp-5d6 still does more average damage than 5d4+5...
Shield-But only if you're dumb enough not to wear a brooch of shielding
Staffan said:Goddamit, I need to start reading more carefully. I read this, and then started up Powerpoint to make a diagram to demonstrate that you were wrong. Then I hit reply, and noted that you said "it is completely possible"...
Oh well, here's the diagram anyway.
Tokens courtesy of Counter Collection Digital, from Fiery Dragon Productions.
Mistwell said:And if you think Magic Missle stops being a good spell after 5th level (which is, by the way, usually when people say it STARTS being a good spell, given it's damage and quantity of targets you can hit with it increases with levels up to 9th level) then perhaps you can tell me what other spell a 9th level caster can cast with a first level spell slot that will be useable in as many situations as magic missle.
Unless he is down, or swarmed by many opponents (large creatures occupy more squares allowing more opponents to simutaneously engage). Forget about casting it in cramped quarters, like narrow dungeon hallways. Oh, and there is that whole 1 round casting time also, maybe you would like to move in that round instead.SgtHulka said:Enlarge Person-Always helpful on the BDF
I know I am woefully out of date on the current Polymorph, but what happens to the amultet/bracers/cloak/whatever that grants him a bonus to AC and will not stack with Mage Armor (because that was the spell used to enchant the item)?SgtHulka said:Mage Armor-Armor the BDF so when you Polymorph him he's at +4 AC
Or you are wearing some other type of brooch/scarab/amulet.SgtHulka said:Shield-But only if you're dumb enough not to wear a brooch of shielding
True, but at the cost of another spell. True Strike + Polar Ray cast by a 16th level caster would deal 16d6 for an average of 56. By comparison, Two castings of magic missile would only do an average of 35. Two maximized magic missile spells (that would be two fourth level spell slots) would do 50 points of damage. Glad to see that being able to cast 8th level spells and use true strike would give you on average 6 more points of damage, than an 8th level sorcerer.SgtHulka said:True Strike-turn all your higher level spells into magic missile auto-hits
Wrong: it deals exactly the same average damage. Requires a to hit, and that you be really close to the guy you want to shock. For a straight caster being close is often not the desire location. Hey, I know, lets cast true strike first, let him take a swing at us, then we get to Shocking Grasp him.SgtHulka said:Shocking Grasp-5d6 still does more average damage than 5d4+5 and it effects all the enemies that are smart enough to wear brooches of shielding
Useless against fire resistant creatures, if you wouldn't fireball them you wouldn't Burning Hands them either. Also, there is that whole save for half thing. A save on a first level spell. So, that average damage would be 12.5, but only 6 if you save.SgtHulka said:Burning Hands-Use it against swarms when you want to save your fireball
Except for flying baddies. Oh, and that whole save against a first level spell thing again like burning hands.SgtHulka said:Grease-save your buddies from all those improved grab monsters or provide sneak attack for your rogue
It's great. It requires a to hit. Hey, why not use true strike first ?SgtHulka said:Ray of Enfeeblement-Lower damage, lower to hit, lower grapple, easier to trip. What's not to like?
apsuman said:I know I am woefully out of date on the current Polymorph, but what happens to the amultet/bracers/cloak/whatever that grants him a bonus to AC and will not stack with Mage Armor (because that was the spell used to enchant the item)?
Hypersmurf said:I don't agree. You don't need line of sight - you need line of effect, which means there must be at least a one-square-foot gap in the squares the spell passes through. There's a lot more than one square foot of space in a square occupied by a creature.
If we were to use 3E terminology, an arrow slit provides 9/10 cover; a creature only provides half cover. Aiming a spell past a creature is not a "narrow passage, such as through an arrow slit". It's mostly empty space.
The situation shown is not one that would cause any difficulty for a fireball placement.
-Hyp.
Mistwell said:It's line of sight, since you are shooting an actual object (a bead) to the location. It is NOT just line of effect.
In this case, there is no question the target you are aiming for has cover (draw the line, and you will see it pretty clearly). It's not total cover, but it IS cover, and you have a chance of hitting that cover if you actually want that particular spot to be the spot where you measure the burst from.
Staffan said:I'll just let Hyp speak for me in this thread. Getting past two guys standing next to one another is far easier than shooting through an arrow slit.
And even if you did require an attack roll... it would be against AC 9 or so (base 10, -5 for immobile object = Dex 0, +4 for cover). Shouldn't be problematic in the least.