• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Maximized spell, then rolls a crit

Status
Not open for further replies.
....Maximize Spell says the spell deals maximum damage. It doesn't say "deals maximum base damage" or "deals maximum damage with its base damage dice" or any such thing. It's very simple and straightforward. How can this confuse you? A Maximized spell deals maximum damage on a critical hit, just as with a normal hit. The only exception is for Empower Spell, which itself states "All variable, numeric effects of an empowered spell are increased by one-half." So Empower Spell specifically affects the variable part, the rolled damage, not the static Maximized damage. Maximize Spell states that "All variable, numeric effects of a spell modified by this feat are maximized.". The increased damage for Empowering the spell is not variable, it's a static 50% extra.

It may or may not make perfect sense, but Empower and Maximize are the only special case in the rules. The extra damage you roll for a critical hit is still part of the spell's effect, so it's covered by Maxmimize and Empower, it's not a separate effect, otherwise Damage Reduction wouldn't count it towards the primary damage dealt, nor would Spell Resistance apply if it weren't part of the spell's effect, and if it were separate, Fire Resistance or whatever would apply separately to both the base damage and the extra damage for a critical hit.

Now we all know that a crit's damage is part of the attack's damage, not separate, and that anything applying against the attack will count the critical damage as part of the attack, so someone with Cold Resistance 10 does not apply it twice against a critical hit from a Polar Ray, nor does a barbarian's Damage Reduction 4/- apply twice against weapon just because the weapon has the Flaming quality dealing an exrtra die of damage. Of course not. We know these things. A critical hit is just part of the normal hit, it's nothing more than an increase in the base damage. That's why extra damage dice aren't multiplied on a crit, like Sneak Attack, because they've already modified the base damage, just like the crit does.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Caliban said:
The fireball spell as printed in the DMG.
Maybe this is the main issue.

You are talking about two different spells.

The Fireball is described in the PHB. :p
 


Caliban said:
No, not really.

Well, call me crazy, but I'm pretty sure I quoted you there. Are you calling me a liar?

Did you actually not post, "Each feat affects the base spell, they do not affect the other feats,"?

Or are you saying I just can't read?

Maybe we have different definitions of "they do not affect the other feats."

It seems to me, rather, that metamagic feats really work like:

1. Only the first metamagic feat applied affects the base spell.
2. All other metamagic feats affect the metamagicked base spell.
3. If Empower and Maximize are present on the "metamagic feat chain," they go last, and Empower must go before Maximize.

A Widened, Maximized, Admixtured Fireball at CL >=10 is then resolved as follows:

1. Admixtured: Instead of a 20' spread of 10d6 Fire damage, it is a 20' spread of 10d6 Fire and 10d6 Cold damage
2. Widened: Instead of a 20' spread of 10d6 Fire and 10d6 Cold damage, it is a 40' spread of 10d6 Fire and 10d6 Cold damage
3. Maximized: Instead of a 40' spread of 10d6 Fire and 10d6 Cold damage, it is a a 40' spread of 60 Fire and 60 Cold damage

If, as you originally stated, every metamagic spell applies to the base spell only, then the fact that it is Admixtured doesn't matter once it is Widened or Maximized. Thus:

1. Admixture: Instead of a [Original Spell] 20' spread of 10d6 Fire damage, it is a [OS] 20' spread of 10d6 Fire and [Metamagic] 20' spread of 10d6 Cold damage

2. Widen: Instead of a [OS] 20' spread of 10d6 Fire and [MM] 20' spread of 10d6 Cold damage, it is a [OS] 20' spread of 10d6 Fire and [MM] 20' spread of 10d6 Cold damage and [MM] 20'-40' spread of 10d6 Fire

3. Maximize: Instead of a a [OS] 20' spread of 10d6 Fire and [MM] 20' spread of 10d6 Cold damage and [MM] 20'-40' spread of 10d6 Fire, it is a [OS] 20' spread of 60 Fire and [MM] 20' spread of 10d6 Cold damage and [MM] 20'-40' spread of 10d6 Fire

Plainly put, every metamagic does not apply to the base spell only. If that isn't the position you want to hold (and it seems that it isn't), then you need to revise your wording. The reason Hyp and I are attacking your position is that your position doesn't make sense - you aren't using the right English words to explain your position. It's OK to admit that.
 

Deep breaths, everybody.

While it is OK to take opposing views on a subject it isn't OK to denigrate one another.

As the ENworld rules say,
Keep it civil: Don't engage in personal attacks, name-calling, or blanket generalizations in your discussions. Say how you feel or what you think, but be careful about ascribing motives to the actions of others or telling others how they "should" think. People seeking to engage and discuss will find themselves asking questions, seeking clarifications, and describing their own opinion. People seeking to "win an argument" sometimes end up taking cheap shots, calling people names, and generally trying to indimidate others. My advice: don't try to win.

And on the other side of the coin, if someone says something which seems like they are denigrating you personally, my first suggestion is to try not to take offence, and ignore it. Certainly don't mention it in your reply.

Thanks for being careful people.

We'll be watching ;)
 

Patryn of Elvenshae said:
Well, call me crazy, but I'm pretty sure I quoted you there. Are you calling me a liar?

...

Or are you saying I just can't read?

Since you seem determined to take everything I post the wrong way, take your pick. I don't care anymore.
 



Status
Not open for further replies.

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top