That investment is too rich for my blood!
D&D 5E MCDM Kingdoms and Warfare is out!
- Thread starter darjr
- Start date
darjr
I crit!
I just skip around in it looking for the good bits.
Cate to summarise? Is the book good?
Whizbang Dustyboots
Gnometown Hero
"How is this book?"
"Here's a 10 hour video to watch during the workday."
It's not a good investment!
That depends on what you do for work.
darjr
I crit!
It’s not a review thread.
But here.
www.geeknative.com
And an overview Matt Colville’s new D&D supplement lets you rule your own kingdom
I’ve only skimmed both of the above.
But here.
D&D transformed: A review of Matthew Colville's Kingdoms & Warfare
Matt Colville's 5e D&D-does-battles supplement is 320-pages long, but I'm pleased to say you don't need to learn a 320-page wargame to get the most out of it. Not even close.
www.geeknative.com
And an overview Matt Colville’s new D&D supplement lets you rule your own kingdom
I’ve only skimmed both of the above.
Chaosmancer
Legend
I think it is a good start, but has some confusing bits and some parts that are just not really going to work for me as written.
I actually had to go to the Reddit thread and ask a clarifying question on how the specialization bonuses are applied, because the level up system for the domains, while cool and inovative, left me confused on how the bonuses were meant to be used. Only one person responded, and we kind of reached a point I think worked, by going backwards and reverse engineering the organizations and how they are built.
The lore in this book is amazing, but also... that is sort of a problem. Using Zaar Anathema, the Shackled King, the King in Gold as a big bad creates a massive adventure that could be a blast to run... but it requires a lot of reworking or just trying to run in Matt's homebrew world.
Additionally, I once again find myself kind of disappointed by certain thematic choices. I am actually planning on using this for a 1v1 game I'm running where the PC is making a cult, because they are a warlock and their patron is a pretty big deal in the story. Well, if I used the "Hidden Cult" specialization for the Religios Order organization, then one of our abilities is going to be blood sacrfice, murdering an entire unit of our own troops to empower the others.... and that is 100% wrong for the flavor of our cult and our PC. And one of our domain features is "spreading the word" to get Crusaders... but we are the start of the cult, there aren't any other people to call to our banner.
Other things like his goblins, well, they all have an ability called "AUUUGGH!!" that is meant to represent them scattering in a panic and injuring every unit around them. But that... doesn't fit the goblins I'm using at all.
Now, on the positive side, reskinning, retheming and even reworking these elements isn't hard. The system is a bit complicated, but the math behind it is easier to figure out, and making your own versions of these things doesn't look to be tooo hard. So, that major frustration of mine is just having to go in and make the rules my own.
Though, there is another concern. Again and again he lays out and says that the only way to destroy an enemy organization is via Warfare, and the major parts of the Intrigue rules like the Defense Levels are explicitly tied to warfare rules, affecting units and positioning.
Which is great if you are a holy order fighting a vampire kingdom, or a noble lord and his court fighting a draconic empire. It is less great if you are say, a cult trying to oppose and weaken the churches so you can gain legitimacy. Or a thieves guild planning a heist against an order of mages. Because the plan is never to go to war, so a lot of the rules end up being less useful the further from the "expected" playstyle you get
Which is understandable, but still kind of frustrating.
Similar Threads
AD6_gamerati_skyscraper
Recent & Upcoming Releases
-
April 16 2024 -
May 31 2024 -
June 3 2024 -
June 4 2024 -
June 18 2024 -
July 16 2024 -
September 17 2024 -
October 1 2024 -
November 12 2024 -
February 18 2025
