Monk whirling steel strike


log in or register to remove this ad

Christian said:
Whirling Steel Strike also requires Weapon Focus: Longsword as a prerequisite. So, a nonhuman monk with no other classes would qualify for this feat at, at the earliest, sixth level. (A human, or a multiclass monk, could qualify as early as third level.)

You are forgetting the Base Attack Bonus +1 prerequisite for Weapon Focus. Even a human can't take Weapon Focus at 1st level unless he is one of the warrior-based classes. Whirling Steel Strike still relegated to 6th level for any straight-classed monk.
 


A Large one-handed weapon is two-handed for a Medium creature. The rules, though, make a distinction between a Large longsword and a Medium greatsword. They're not interchangeable. That's one of the 3.5 changes.
 

hmm ok so it is technically possible although it sounds abit cheesy. Going to try and get my hands on a copy of the full whirling steel strike feat and stats for a large longsword. how would that work with flurry of blows? (using a large longsword i mean)

i mean does a non-light weapon mean a -2 attack for medium weapons (and hence a -4 for large weapons?) Not sure where i got that from i think it was a previous post. PH doesnt say anything about it (since it just talks about flurry in terms of normal monk weapons) and i cant find a full copy of the feat on the net (going to check out the ebberon campaign guide at the local bookshop when i leave work :D

thanks guys!
Marc
 

Well, with Monkey Grip, you still take a -2 or something to all your attacks. You'd probably use the Flurry of Blows attack progression and tack on a -2 to all the attacks, since he's using a Large longsword.
 

Jurble said:
i mean does a non-light weapon mean a -2 attack for medium weapons (and hence a -4 for large weapons?) Not sure where i got that from i think it was a previous post. PH doesnt say anything about it (since it just talks about flurry in terms of normal monk weapons)...

Don't forget, a quarterstaff is a two-handed monk weapon, and there's no mention of special penalties for using it in a Flurry.

-Hyp.
 


hong said:
Bah, just play one of these and take this feat and this feat.
Jurbon said:
Dont want to let him take something that isnt official/definately balanced.

Somehow, if he's wary of allowing a feat from a WotC campaign setting, allowing a class from 'some guy on the Internet' strikes me as pretty unlikely.

-Hyp.
 

hong said:
Bah, just play one of these and take this feat and this feat.

Hm, it just doesn't feel right to be pimping something I haven't touched in six months. But then again, that never stopped me before.

I have always been impressed with your Martial Artist. I just haven't ever had a chance to play one...
 

Remove ads

Top