Pants said:Oh noez!!!111
God forbid they (gasp!) make something new!!!!![]()
*screams of terror and bloodshed in the background*
Well, yeah, IMHO, God please forbid most of it. I like the ratio of converted monsters to new to be 50/50 rather than 10/90
Pants said:Oh noez!!!111
God forbid they (gasp!) make something new!!!!![]()
*screams of terror and bloodshed in the background*
Actually, according to the ECS, the fastieth is based on the leaellynasaura, a real species.~Johnny~ said:Just to confim what Kesh said, the new dinosaurs are entirely new. Like Eberron's "fastieth," they are based on known families but not on specific, known species.
Upper_Krust said:Yet an Ultroloth rules Daemonkind from the Khin Oin - Bring back Anthraxus WotC, this whole Mydianchlarus business is nonsensical. Instead of unleashing the likes of Bubonicus, Cholerix and Typhus upon us (absent from the Book of Vile Darkness for some ungodly reason) we get nothing.
There's an FR fiend book coming out isn't there?Shemeska said:Well here's hoping that any future fiend book has the 'loths in all their 'lothy glory. And the possibility for a fiend book, or two, was at least hinted at in the DnD General seminar at GenCon when I asked a few questions. I remain cautiously optimistic.
I think "Heracles" means "Loved by Hera" - which is ironic, as she pretty much despised the poor guy (you know, being the progeny of her husband Zeus and some lowly human trollop).Heracles/Hercules: 'Glorious Gift', if Babynames.com can be trusted.
Pants said:There's an FR fiend book coming out isn't there?
Gez said:I'm curious concerning the difference between the Desert Giant from MM3 and the Sand Giant from MM2. (If someone can elaborate a bit on the Death and Eldritch giants too, that would be nice.)