Flyspeck23
First Post
mojo1701 said:A singularity is a black hole, I believe.
A singularity does exist "inside" a black hole, yes.
mojo1701 said:A singularity is a black hole, I believe.
It was definitely McCoy - in fact, I believe the musing was somewhere near the beginning of Diane Duane's Spock's World.Mouseferatu said:You know, that topic actually came up in one of the old Star Trek novels. (One of the few that was actaully decent, IIRC, though I can't for the life of me remember which one.) Someone--probably Dr. McCoy, though I couldn't swear to that--was discussing the transporter, and wondering if it didn't kill you. After all, if it killed the original person but created a perfect duplicate that believed it was the original person, or if it created a thing that was alive but had no "soul," how would anyone ever really know?
The_Universe said:It was definitely McCoy - in fact, I believe the musing was somewhere near the beginning of Diane Duane's Spock's World.
Allanon said:Security. In for example Star Trek everyone seems to bypass security with easy. Even non-intelligent lifeforms are either not detected or somehow instictively now all the important subroutines to acces main ship controls. In never amazes me how a lot of science fiction series seem to feature diffenent aliens or entities with no prior knowledge to eachother existance who somehow seem to be able to bypass, disable, override or nullify every security system the other one has.
Something else that never amazes me is how hits to the shield systems or a completely different part of the ship always seem to blow out consoles and systems within the bridge section. Methinks that it would be wise to insulate or otherwise protect those systems from suddenly blowing out. I mean circuitbrakers are commenplace even in these times.
Flyspeck23 said:A singularity does exist "inside" a black hole, yes.
What confuses me is that if you're generating your own gravity (and let's just leave that little one aside, shall we?) and something causes your ship to shake, why do people lean from side to side? Their relative acceleration due to gravity doesn't change no matter what orientation the ship is in, right? So what's with the leaning?LordVyreth said:extras go flying over the guardrails...Actually, that leads to some questions about the wisdom of bridge design and the lack of seat belts as well.
So let's put half the world's population on one side, and half on the other, and SQQQUUUUUUEEEEEEEEEEEZZZZZZZZZZZEEEEEEEEEEE...Pbartender said:the Earth would have to be compressed down to less than 2 cm wide before it could form a black hole.
barsoomcore said:What confuses me is that if you're generating your own gravity (and let's just leave that little one aside, shall we?) and something causes your ship to shake, why do people lean from side to side? Their relative acceleration due to gravity doesn't change no matter what orientation the ship is in, right? So what's with the leaning?
Generating gravity. Okay.
Oh, and if you can teleport, as explicitly described in Star Trek (breaking down matter and transmitting it for re-assembly), then you can synthesize matter. At arbitrary points in space.
So what, exactly, does Scotty do? I mean, why don't they just have every single component of the Enterprise listed in the ship's memory, and anytime there's any damage, just "transporter" the broken version out and stick a new version of the component into its appropriate location?
"The hoobajoob's cracked! Quick, press the 'New Hoobajoob' button. Okay, phew."
Flyspeck23 said:IIRC there was a DS9 episode where a shuttle exploded with half of the main cast in it. They beamed out in time, but only barely - they were "stuck" in the ship's memory, only to appear on the holodeck. For some reason, they couldn't stop the running program (James Bond rip-off), or else these people (Sisko, O'Brian, Kira and Dex - again, IIRC) would've died.
Gosh, that was an awful episode. Didn't make any sense whatsoever.