Gryph
First Post
OTOH, like it though I do, i have to say where Hybridizing fails utterly is one place I spend a lot of time: PCs who are not dabblers or 50/50 guys, but (non-Bardic) Jacks of all trades.
Which is why I like it...but not as much as 3.5Ed's rules.
It may not possible to represent this sort of character from level 1 on the way I would prefer. One of my earliest D&D character's was a Fighter/Mage/Druid. Something that I could not recreate after 2e to my own satisfaction. Waiting until level 6 to be the equivalent of 2/2/2 seems like the wrong pace and choosing features from 3 or more classes at each level seems like an insurmountable balancing issue.
I think your scenario is a good illustration of the difference in our preferences. I would rather give up the ability to triple (or more) class than have to use the 3e method to get there.