• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

My last LotR eagle question.

1) Gandalf says they can't attract attention on the quest.
2) Giant eagles are big and attract attention.
3) Nazgul can fly and, therefore, deal with flying things that attract attention.

That's it. It's fairly obvious, which is probably why it didn't need to be mentioned in the books.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

As has been mentioned, and I will mention again:

* Gandalf could not protect anyone going into Mordor openly. Nothing he could do would keep Sauron from throwing everything he had at any attacker, whether on the ground or in the sky. Gandalf was simply no match for Sauron at all, which is made clear in the books. So there would be no point ion sending him as protection, and, since he'd be just about the only guy with a chance to do it, there's be even less point in sending anyone else.

* The Ring gets more powerful the closer it gets to where it was forged. This is an important point, that goes directly to the heart of the problem. Frodo was specifically the best person for the job because hobbits were not very powerful. The Ring offered power in proportion to the power already possessed by its wielder. Thus, the least powerful beings were the least likely to be corruptible by the Ring. Now, consider: what good would it do to send Frodo in on a great eagle, or a squadron of them? The closer they got to Mount Doom, the more powerful the Ring would become. The great eagles, like Gwaihir, were very powerful themselves. Chances are even they would be corrupted by the Ring just as they stooped to dive on Mount Doom,
just as Frodo was finally corrupted at the Crack of Doom
. The implications are there throughout the books - powerful folk like Galadriel or Gandalf or Elrond simply would not be able to resist the Ring for the length of a journey to destroy it, especially since they'd be going straight to where it was at its most powerful. They didn't go through the list of everyone available to take the Ring, simply because there was no need to - Tolkien demonstrated explicitly, in all the scenes in which the Ring is offered to some of the most powerful people in Middle-earth, that these powerful beings could not be expected to resist the Ring in such circumstances. They barely did so when they were at home, they couldn't be expected to do so at the birthplace of the Ring. The same could be said of the eagles.

By the way, before he gets mentioned, Tom Bombadil is discussed directly in the book, but he's a special case - the Ring demonstrably had no power over him. He simply wouldn't want to do it.
 

KenM said:
Those are good points. Since JRRT did not like tech himself, He might never have thought that he had a logic flaw in his grand tale.
Someone else said that not everything in a book has to make sense, it does to me. if the writer/ teller of the story shows an easier way for the characters to accomplish they're goal, and does not explain why the characters does not use the eaiser way, then the story is flawed, and I can't accept it.
Here is an expample: say some peole have to get across a lake, the person that tells them they have to get across the lake shows up in a speedboat (like Gandalf got droped of at rivendale by an eagle.). He also says they don't have much time. So the characters start to swim across the lake. They don't use the speedboat and its never explained why they did not. That is how I feel about the eagles not helping in LoTR. I will not accept "dramatic effect" or "thats the way the author wrote it", there has to be logic to the characters actions.

In art (meaning creative ventures like music, painting and writing) there is the idea that the unsaid is almost as powerful as the said. That is the colors not used in a painting, the spaces between the notes in music, or the things not written in writing. However, Tolkien does not use this technique. He blatently states why the Eagles do not help carry the ring into Mordor. You just have to pay attention.

Gandalf got dropped off in Rohan (not Rivendell) by an eagle so he could get a horse. This is because Gwaihir heavily implied that he had other things to do:

'"How far can you bear me?" I said to Gwaihir.
'"Many leagues," said he, "but not to the ends of the earth. I was sent to bear tidings, not burdens."

The ring, by all description, is a burden.

It is made clear in the Council of Elrond that spies are everywhere. It is known that the West Road is watched and that if they moved in any fashion that would indicate that they had the ring, then Sauron and Mordors might would be directedagainst that region. So they state that they cannot move in any way that shows they have it. This includes hopping on an eagle and air lifting Frodo to Mordor.

Furthermore, there is the element of destiny. The ring gets harder and harder to bear the closer and closer it gets to Mt. Doom. Should Frodo get there in a day, the ring would be too much too quick. The ring was too much even though the burden increased at a gradual pace. I fully belive that had Frodo been there on the back of an eagle, it would have broken him and Sauron would not have been nearly as distracted as it states he was in the Return of the King: "The Dark Lord was suddenly aware of him,...;and the magnitude of his own folly was revealed to him in a blinding flash, and all the devices of his enemies were at last laid bare. [Sauron figures out that his enemies want to destroy the ring...] From all his policies and webs of fear and treachery, from his strategems and wars his mind shook free;..."

And I think Tolkein knew this too and planned on it. I think he was making the point that a higher power was at work. Gandalf was not above the ring's corruption and flying in on the back of an eagle he may have succumbed to the temptation to use it, even if he was on a different eagle just looking out for Frodo.

However, the eagles only help when Gandalf is in trouble. They rescue him and the dwarves from the hobgoblins in The Hobbit, they rescue him from Saruman, they take him from Zirakzigil (after he defeats the Balrog). And I think this is because the eagles owe Gandlaf one. A big one. We are never told what it is but there is this quote from The Return of the King:

"Twice you have born me, Gwaihir my friend," said Gandalf. "Thrice shall pay for all, if you are willing. You will not find me a burden much greater than when you bore me from Zirakzigil, where my old life burned away." Apparently Gwaihir is repaying some old debt. And I would also point out that he only ever helps Gandalf. And then only helps Hobbits at Gandalfs request.

Also, Gandalf states every time he is with an eagle and conscious that they have to be willing to help him. Perhaps they simply did not want to go to Mordor, like most everyone else in the world.

So there are some clearly stated mittigating factors to flying the ring to mordor:

1)The ring gets stonger as it gets closer. So the sudden increase in the burden might be too much to take. The increase needs to be gradual if there is going to be any hope.

2)The Eagles constantly save Gandalf's butt because the eagles owe him somthing. What? No one knows except obscure Tolkien shcolars.

3)The Eagles may not want to go to Mordor. There is a big issue of free will here, as Gandalf constantly asks if they are up to the tasks he sets for them.

4)Whoever gets to Mt. Doom with the ring will claim it for themselves. When the ring is claimed that close to home, the ringwraiths grop everything and go there. Sauron Drops Everything and focuses there. Game over.

5)Fate. Looking at 4 we see that: No Gollum, No Ring Destruction. Fate and the nature of the ring dictate that they have to go by land and pick up gollum. Also, using 4, if a powerful person gets to Mt. Doom with Frodo, they take ring and replace Sauron, so the powerful people have to be kept busy and out of Frodo's hair or game over.

That is why the ring has to be walked to Mordor. It Cannot be flown in by the Eagles. And I think it is clearly stated well enough. There is a lot to pick up on in this story. It is not simple. It is not easy reading. If that is what you are looking for search elsewhere. Most of what people consider flaws in this book are largely either from taste (they don't like Tom Bombadill) or from missing somthing.

Aaron.
 
Last edited:

KenM said:
I don't mean for them to attack the forces of Mordor once they get there, but eagles can fly fast. I never siad for them to attack, thats why you have Gandalf go with them to protect them, They fly in, Frodo drops the ring in. If JRRT uses the eagles in other ways, he can use them in this way. Seems logical to me. JRRT metions Mordor is too strong for convential forces to go in strong. But the eagles can fly high and dive in from a great height right over Mt. Doom.
I would expect to have someone mention about getting the eagles help, with either Gandalf or Elround saying. "that would not work because........" or " we tryed that and they would be drawn to them" or something like that. Yes IMO the eagles can make the characters jobs easier, and JRRT does not explin why they don't use them. He needed to explin it more.
Like someone else said, it does lead to fun discussion. :D

KenM I'm not sure why your avoiding the most obvious point which is that the Eagles would be spotted and thus dealt with easily. Not only does Sauron have winged Nazgul but he also has complete control over the storms around Mordor. They'd be toast as soon as they were spotted. I'm also not entirely sure how you imagine an Eagle can dive right into an erupting Volcano either not withstanding the point that whoever was charged with dropping it would probably be unable to do so. Again its intuitively obvious why they can't use the Eagles, why you need it spelled out in the book I'm not sure but each to their own :).
 

KenM said:
I also love how everyone says "the eagles are not a taxi service", But Gandalf clearly calls one to "pick him up" in FotR. ;)

Well, that makes them a chauffer service. Much more selective.

Though, the fact that the eagles always seem to rally around Gandalf is telling. You see, implication is a valid literary tool (so JRRT does not have to mention that having the Company of the Ring get in a clown car to drive up to the Gates isn't a good idea). So are imagry and symbology.

In the celtic and anglo-saxon traditions from which Tolkien takes inspiration, the eagle is one symbol of connection with divinity. In a symbolic sense, Gandalf can call on the eagles because Gandalf is, in fact, a divine power himself. But divine power isn't to be used lightly. Saving the bacon of a semi-divinity is one thing (especially when in LotR, the Eagles show when Gandalf is fairly directly facing another similarly divine critter like Saruman and Sauron). Saving the bacon of mortals who are supposed to be tested to see if they can fend for themselves is quite another.

Oh, someone will no doubt bring up The Hobbit, and the Eagles saving Bilbo and company. Well, for one thing Gandalf is there. For another, one can read that (again, symbolically) as the divine hand making sure Bilbo says on the road to recovering the One Ring, which is required for the testing of mortals in the trilogy to follow. Plus, The Hobbit wasn't written on quite the same basis of rigor as the LotR in the first place.
 
Last edited:

KenM said:
So, when an eagle comes in to rescue Gandalf from the top of Isengaurd, NONE of the orcs/ goblins, ect. on the ground saw it or fired any arrows at it? I think there would have been resistance there. I also love how everyone says "the eagles are not a taxi service", But Gandalf clearly calls one to "pick him up" in FotR. ;)
Clearly calls one to "pick him up" in the movie.

If you read the books, you'll find that Gandalf was not really that hot about going to see Saruman, and in fact only went when Radagast the Brown (another of the wizards) met him on the road and told Gandalf that Saruman wanted to speak with him (I'm giving you the Reader's Digest version). Since Saruman is the head of the Istari order, Gandalf obeys, and tells Radagast to send any tidings he hears to them (both Saruman and Gandalf) at Isengard.

It is while Gandalf is in Isengard that Saruman betrays him and imprisons him atop the tower. While Saruman is away (presumably recruiting for his army), Gwahir shows up at Isengard, with news from Radagast. Gwahir fully expects to relay his news to both Gandalf and Saruman, but upon finding Gandalf alone, and having Saruman's treachery explained to him, he takes Gandalf with him.

Thus, there is a very good reason as to why the orcs at Isengard would not have shot Gwahir down... Gwahir is apparently a semi-regular visitor to Isengard who brings news and information to Saruman. His coming was not at all out of the ordinary! In fact, one of Gandalf's comments is that "Saruman has never paid enough attention to animals" (or something to that effect) - hinting that Saruman did not realize that Gwahir might help Gandalf escape.

As for using the eagles as a sort of deux ex machina, I have heard that argument and it doesn't work for me, either. The saving of the dwarves by the eagles in the Hobbit came about because the eagles saw and unusual amount of goblin activity on the side of the Misty Mountains (due to the Goblin King being slain by Gandalf; it was rather like stirring up a hornet's nest) and were (justifiably) concerned to see what was going on. While there, they spotted Gandalf and the dwarves, and in order to return an old favor to Gandalf, rescued him. Nothing too incredible about that. When Gwahir comes to Isengard in FotR, again, it is in the natural course of the story... in fact it takes him a good deal of time (some weeks, if not months, if memory serves) to show up after Gandalf's imprisonment. Again, given the role of the eagles - as scouts/spies for the forces of good, it makes sense that he would eventually show up to give a report.

Contrast the airspace at Isengard (where Eagles were infrequent, but known visitors) with the airspace in Mordor. Even a single eagle would draw the immediate attention of Sauron, because the only things he "expects" to be up in the airspace are Nazgul. The eagles simply CANNOT show up in Mordor as they do in Isengard for that reason.

We could go on and on and on, but I think what you're looking for is, "where in LotR did Tolkien write specifically a sentence that begins, 'we can't use the Eagles to drop the ring into Mount Doom because...'" and you're not going to find it. As others have pointed out, there are a NUMBER of reasons why using eagles would not work pointed out in the text itself without specifically enumerating "Eagles." One might just as well ask why Gandalf, Elrond, and Galadriel did not simply use the might of the Three to cut a swath through Mordor and dispose of the one... or why Ulmo didn't just give Frodo the cloak and armor he gave to Turin during the second age (the one that shielded him from sight) and let him do things that way.

Simply put, there was NO force of arms sufficient to "blast through" Sauron's defenses. Period. End of discussion. This is made abundantly clear in LotR. The Ring went to Mordor in secrecy and not through force of arms out of necessity... and even then made it only because Sauron could not comprehend that anyone would want to destroy the Ring... and because Sauron did not follow the Evil Overlord's Handbook and destroy Mount Doom itself as soon as he had the chance so that the Ring could never be cast into Mount Doom (or at the very least, he would have stationed an impenetrable guard there).

The Hobbits get into Mordor by "not being seen." There is no chance an eagle could get into Mordor unseen. Sauron can choose to bring irresistable force against anything he chooses to, particularly in his own realm, therefore he could bring irresistable force against any number of eagles. Q.E.D.

--The Sigil
 

Forgive me for comparing LotR to terrorist attacks, but the analogy IS apt...

I suppose I should add that using Eagles wouldn't work for the same reason Terrorists Hijacking Planes won't work again... terrorists don't find an attractive target, get into position five miles away, then charge in guns akimbo... because they know if they do, they'll be wiped out. They rely on getting in close enough to strike a crippling blow before the opponent comprehends what's going on.

While your plan is completely unfathomable to your opponent, you have a chance to execute it. The instant your opponent can understand your plan, he can block it. Look at Flight 92... the passengers had time to understand what the plan was (due to conversation with family) and had the force of arms - and determination - to stop the attack.

Similarly, the moment the eagles appear and Sauron realizes what the game is, the game is over, and Sauron wins. He has enough time to bring them down. The reason the Ring was destroyed is that by the time Sauron understands what the game is, the game is all but over, and he's too late to stop it... there's not enough time to interpose a wraith between the ringbearer and Mount Doom.

--The Sigil
 

Originally posted by Jester47:

And I think this is because the eagles owe Gandlaf one. A big one. We are never told what it is but there is this quote from The Return of the King:

"Twice you have born me, Gwaihir my friend," said Gandalf. "Thrice shall pay for all, if you are willing. You will not find me a burden much greater than when you bore me from Zirakzigil, where my old life burned away." Apparently Gwaihir is repaying some old debt. And I would also point out that he only ever helps Gandalf. And then only helps Hobbits at Gandalfs request
.

The Hobbit

Chapter VI- Out of the Frying-Pan into the Fire

"The wizard and the eagle-lord appeared to know one another slightly, and even to be on friendly terms. As a matter of fact Gandalf, who had often been in the mountains, had once rendered a service to the eagles and healed their lord from an arrow-wound."
That little passage sheds some light on the debt that the eagles owed to Gandalf. The following passage may help KenM out a bit with his acceptance of the story. Somehow I doubt it since it is found in "The Hobbit" and not in the Lord of the Rings which should stand on its own of course. ;)

"No! we are glad to cheat the goblins of their sport, and glad to repay our thanks to you, but we will not risk ourselves for dwarves in the southward plains."

The eagles offer aid on their terms and do not lightly risk themselves. As others have said KenM, you are not going to find a specific statement which says what you want. However, it is inferred thorughout LotR and even The Hobbit(see above) why the eagles cannot be used.

If you need something like this spelled out for you I have a hard time believeing that you could possibly enjoy any story at all. Out of curiousity do you disagree with the points others have made? Can you see how inference rather than blunt statement was used?
 
Last edited:



Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top