I'm going to take a slightly different approach. You are talking about two different DM's, and this one doesn't sound great, but most of his 'demands' don't seem that bad.
There are a ton of options available to you. Just stay away from the templates and half-whatevers and build an interesting character. While it seems that this DM is a bit heavy handed, I can see how he may have gotten the impression that you like to powergame. (correct or incorrect impression is a different topic) He is trying to protect his campaign.
Are the other players aasimars and half-celestials etc.? Do they have wives, brothers, uncles that they hope to get 'effective help' from as a freebie? Can the other two rolling up characters freely choose cleric/wizard/sorcerer? If not, just chill and play the game. He may not qualify for DM of the Year, but it just doesn't sound all that bad. (remember folks, he has described two different DM's throughout this)
He ruled out 3 classes, and pushed back a bit on you wanting to be half-celestial, and have crystals growing out, and wings, and weird stuff like that. (I don't get the tiberian sun reference, sorry). I think that is pretty much all very within reason.
Hope it works out for you.
Because it is a different world. I play in a Kalamar game, and a a Forgotten realms game, and a star wars game. THey happen to be different types of worlds, with different restrictions etc. If he was running Midnight, and you complained about not being a high level mage, you would be wrong. He is running a world with few clerics, that is part of the campaign, I don't see the problem.Caeleddin said:The thing is, he wasn't like that in that system. Only in this system, for some bizarre reason.
Which means he *may* have cheated, or that one person had to be the lowest, and you were it. It is still PB 23, which is quite playable, even if you are not a fighter.Yes, he rolled my stats. From the stats of the other 2 new players (he sent them all on the same e-mail), I had the lowest stats, with the lowest total stat bonus and the lowest number of odds (which means nothing to them).
Perfectly reasonable.He started off with saying "low divine, so no clerics",
From what you said, there are already one wizard and one sorcerer. And he doesn't want half the party going that way. While not my style, it doesn't seem too uncalled for.and proceded to outlaw Wizards and Sorcerors
No, he said he would count the blade as an item. That I don't agree with, but how much is it worth? Is it *that* big of a deal? You get 88,000 GP, if the blade is 'counted' as 5-10K...who really cares?and more or less outlawed Soulknives for me.
No, you rule out druids.He knows I hate having to roll up monsters and keep track of half-a-dozen summoned stuff at a time, so he can safely rule out Druids for me.
No, you are saying it can not be bard/rogue. From what you have said (ie, one side of the discussion) the only thing he has is no cleric/wizard/sorcerer, for the mentioned reasons. YOU have ruled out soulknife, bard, rogue, druid. That still leaves fighter, ranger, paladin, barbarian, psion, psychic warrior, wilder, and even monk. So he ruled out 3 of 15.He also knows I hate playing Bards and Rogues. So, I guess he is more or less picking the classes for me.
So be 'heroic' without being half-celestial. Heroic is determined by the actions, not the race or backstory.I wanted to play the heroic type, probably Half-Celestial of some description, with a wife and a kid.
Heck, your lucky. In my campaign I would just have said no. Sorry, no kids with wings and crystals in my world.The wife was to be like that lady in Tiberian Sun, so that we get a child with wings and crystals gowing out of her head (I actually started the character concept with the kid rather than with my character).
Don't know if there are rules regarding this, but his interpretation seems reasonable.He ruled that quarter-Celestials are Aasimars and so have no wings.
So why do you care about your wife being 'effective', I thought it was just a backstory? But if you want an 'effective full celestial' then maybe a feat isn't such a bad idea. If you just want a wife for the backstory, then you shouldn't need a feat.I also HAVE to take the Leadership feat in order to have this wife "effectively" (ie., have her give me advice on things she knows, etc., which would be determined by him, since he is playing her as an NPC).
There are a ton of options available to you. Just stay away from the templates and half-whatevers and build an interesting character. While it seems that this DM is a bit heavy handed, I can see how he may have gotten the impression that you like to powergame. (correct or incorrect impression is a different topic) He is trying to protect his campaign.
Are the other players aasimars and half-celestials etc.? Do they have wives, brothers, uncles that they hope to get 'effective help' from as a freebie? Can the other two rolling up characters freely choose cleric/wizard/sorcerer? If not, just chill and play the game. He may not qualify for DM of the Year, but it just doesn't sound all that bad. (remember folks, he has described two different DM's throughout this)
He ruled out 3 classes, and pushed back a bit on you wanting to be half-celestial, and have crystals growing out, and wings, and weird stuff like that. (I don't get the tiberian sun reference, sorry). I think that is pretty much all very within reason.
Hope it works out for you.