The new paths are
- Path of the Ancestral Guardian
- Path of the Storm Herald
- Path of the Zealot
This. I'm just not loving the Barbarian. The Berserker path could easily be turned into a Fighter kit. The Totem, I guess, could be thrown to the Druid for something more combative w/o the shape-shifting. These new paths don't actually do anything for me.
Really, I'd rather see the Barbarian looted and divvied between the Fighter, Ranger, and a new Shaman class.
I guess I see the shaman as someone who makes deals with spirits (and that is deals plural, not like the one time warlock gig), so he/she appeals to the honored ancestors for guidance on Tuesday, makes a deal with a primal spirit to have uncursed access to a site of primal power on Thursday, and convinces a nasty wrath to attack somebody he/she doesn't like on Saturday......
If it becomes spirit-focused, there is less need to overlap with the druid, because the nature part is just part of the gig (only where there are nature spirits involved).
Wisdom and charisma would be the good saves. Subclasses could be similar to the warlock's pact implements (but with more stuff since they are full subclasses): pet, gish, and maybe some kind of fetish instead of the book......
But I see druids having an equal connection to the physical and spiritual aspects of nature. A Shaman class would be better suited as a Druid subclass.
Why would a barbarian, full of melee-orientated class abilities, want to hang back and let his/her spirit companion fight for him/her like the 4e shaman would?
I am afraid we need to hold you back a grade in barbarian 101.
That is why my overall reaction is "enough with the barbarian subclasses already".But, no, sub-classes aren't going to change much or open up new ways to play, sub-classes just aren't that dramatically different. You'd need new classes with new mechanics to shake things up that much.
Tony got it in one!Okay, I can see that. I was trying to figure out why he was asking for a shaman in a barbarian subclass. There are plenty of good places to put a shaman, but barbarian was a funny one.
Thank you.
Y'know, somebody's probably been dying for them. Order is less important to me than quality.That is why my overall reaction is "enough with the barbarian subclasses already". There are much more pressing subclass needs to attend to first.
Certainly. For Shaman, I've heard Artificer sub-class, which sounds weird, but might make sense mechanically.More battlemaster maneuvers (and tiered maneuvers!). Pretty much every sorcerer subclass except the fire dragon descendant. And yes, I want a Shaman, and yes, it needs to be something more than a barbarian subclass.
With each domain constituting a sub-class that sounds like a lot. Cleric & Wizard are already way out ahead in terms of number of sub-classes.Cleric domains to fully cover the entire 3E catalog.
Pssh. Binder subclass. The 3E Tome of Magic even had a sidebar about it.For Shaman, I've heard Artificer sub-class, which sounds weird, but might make sense mechanically.
I guess I see the shaman as someone who makes deals with spirits (and that is deals plural, not like the one time warlock gig), so he/she appeals to the honored ancestors for guidance on Tuesday, makes a deal with a primal spirit to have uncursed access to a site of primal power on Thursday, and convinces a nasty wrath to attack somebody he/she doesn't like on Saturday.......