New Chat Site?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cystuni
  • Start date Start date
Krystal to the Rescue

Ok, since there is a concern that people are getting off track, finding the main points hard to follow (or hard to find period) as well as a concern that Mel won't be able to make sense of it all, I bring to you all, a summarization of the concerns related to chat (minus the discussion between patrons)

Hopefully this clears a few things up. If there's anything I have missed, please pm me. This took me roughly 45 minutes, and I'm sure there are a few things I've missed / not stated clearly.

Without further ado:

Complaints / Dislikes:

1) We have to remake all our characters that we have in the chats on the boards as well.
Concerns:
1) Obtaining all our screen names. What to do should someone "steal" our names
2) Can't use spaces; many of us who have a boards name with spaces have to try to recreate it without (and perhaps those of us with spaces did so because other attempts to do so without a space were already used)

3) Having to recreate our names floods our email with notification / verification emails. Not only does this fill our email boxes, it adds extra time to having to recreate names (many of us have 20+ names)

2) NO DESCRIPTIONS
Concerns:
1) Proposed solution of a description thread on the boards is time consuming and distracting, requires us to flit between screens and those of us who are slower readers may lose track of the chat. Also, those of us with slower connections / etc may take a while to load.

3) Lack of Security
Concerns:
1) Java applets are not known to be the most secure.
2) Concern over IP addresses being accessable by other users (this has been addressed, supposedly this is not a concern as they come up for you but to others as xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx) However, many of us would like to see that removed entirely
3) The possibility of someone obtaining the encrypted IP address and later decrypting it at their leisure
4) Lack of trust? with Sun Microsystems.
5) Java-hacked version of IRC. IRC is known to be insecure.

4) Inability to change colors for text
Concerns:
1) Color blind individuals will find the red and blue diffficult to read
2) Can't set things like /msg (the equivalent of /tell) to a different color to make it stand out more.
Given Reason for lack of color:
Concern over room disruption because of people doing funky color combos.
Counterpoint for reason:
We don't want to be able to force others to see our colors, just customize our own look and feel. This being the case, it would not be room disruption or indeed disruptive at all. If the new chat does not contain client customability but requires that colors we pick get sent to all, this is a step BACKWARDS in functionality.

5) Clunky Interface
1) Slow to load
2) Not intuitive
3) Too many ways to do the same thing (I don't need three different ways to send private messages thank you)
4) ! for actions is distracting
5) /me versus : (colon) -- hard to get used to, wasted keystrokes
6) Having to flit between tabs of private messages and chat... it is possible to lose track of the chat this way.
7) Lack of the "pause" feature as ichat has
8) Highlighting / copying pasting is non-intuitive and clunky
9) Lack of resizability -- addressed, supposedly we can "tear" tabs away and they go into their own window... ( Tear? Ok... I shouldn't have to "tear" things away... )
10) Not very cross-platform: Depending on your OS / browser, logging in is difficult to log in, if not impossible
11) Lack of "Username Says"---it is replaced simply by <Username> -- breaks the feeling of the role play
12) All old commands are moot: we now have to sit down and learn more commands
13) Being logged in to multiple rooms can be disconcerting. Also, it counts a user as being in each room. So if one user is logged into five rooms but only chatting in one, someone might go to one of the rooms a use is logged into but not chatting in, and have to roam around to find the one the user IS chatting in.
14) Lack of /think
15) Lack of bold, underline, and italics
16) Lack of predefined emotes, such as /hug, /wave, etc
17) Concerns with user options... not much to configure, hard to read right now (I believe it shows up as white on light grey..)
18) Lack of the ability to send private messages to multiple people at once (I do not know if this is possible, nor how difficult it is if it *is* possible. I have heard people say yes and people say no)


6) Community Issues
1) What if the boards go down, will that affect the chat?
2) Having Live and ISRP split -- makes it difficult to go to events when you're playing (most like the reminder shouts while they are rping so they don't lose track of time and can play up until the event) Also, having this split stops those of us who used to chat in pms with non-roleplayers in live while we role played -- again, we are splitting the community, and we're split bad enough as it is by our own designs.
3) Lack of the banners at the top which linked to thinks such as the greyhawk journal, prices for food, weather, etc...
4) Lack of /go
5) Having the list of rooms on a separate tab instead of just simply using /roomlist


7) Various other issues
1) Dislike having the same name on boards and chat
2) Lack of direct java support as a result of Sun?
3) Lack of being able to use other clients to log in ( IE: we can use ichat or cheetachat to log into wizards currently)
4) Having the chat and boards together
5) Concerns about the fact that Wizards kept software that was promised to do things it turned out it can't rather than sending it back and looking for better software
6) Java is known to tax people's systems
7) New skin is.. well... not all it's cracked up to be.
8) The handout for explaining the interface mentions some things that aren't actually there (hint hint: Button for configuring colors)


Things that are liked:

1) P2P Chat. Many find it nice to have it in a separate window.
Counterpoint: Ichat had the same thing if you right clicked on their name and selected to send them a pm. (As memory serves). Also, see dislike 5) 6).
2) Tabbed chatting... though many don't seem to see the ability to be in two+ rooms at once manageable / wanted.
3) New Menu for bots
4) Chat and boards together. See complaint 7)4).


Enjoy.

Edit: Added number 18) to the Clunky Interface Category.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Before I go on to address the new questions/reguest that people have listed, I'll attempt to clarify my last statement "Please understand that I am not here to try and "convince" people to stay or to continually argue why the decision to change software--and to this software in particular--was not an idiotic move made by a company that is bent on spending time and money dedicated to expunging IC roleplay on thier site."

It was meant drily, and I agree that does not always come through in typed posts.

My point was that I do intend to argue over an underlying belief that Wizards as a company has an agenda of wanting to "kill" ISRP.

The dry part comes in at the pointing out that if Wizards *did* want to "kill ISRP" then they certainly have a funny way of spending lots of time and money to do it when, surely, it would be much more simple to go in without notice and remove those rooms, end of story.

As for trying to convince people to stay, I am not going to insult people's intelligence with smooth words and promises. I can only say that I care about our chat users, and thus I will tweek what I can to preserve or emulate functionality that is of concern, and be up front when I know something can't be done.

-Mel
 

Picking back up where I left off -

Dragona Nightsky said:
2. User Options, or whatever the first button is called. I'm also getting the "white-out" blocks. Can't really tell what I'm doing in there, which sucks. Can we fix that?

Yes, this is near the top of my list and I am talking with Akiva about it now.

3. Multiple Screen Names. Yeah, it is going to be a pain to re-create all my screen names for the boards. :bored: (This is what I get for having over 50 or so characters :twitch: ). On the bright side, at least I can get them all under one e-mail now?

That is going to be a pain, but my offer to help assist anyone with screen name issues stands. And, yep, they can all be under one email--which you can change if you ever need to.

4. Actions. I am glad we still have actions, but is there any way to remove that annoying ! thingy in from of them? Eh, it kinda looks like this:
icon4.gif
but it's a red triangle with a white ! I believe. Dunno if it bugs anyone else, but it's pretty damn annoying to me.

I believe that that can be changed. I will look into it. I would interested in knowing what kind of icon you would find better. (at 12 x 12 pixels)
 


Jardel_Karabella said:
* No top frame to provide room information as you enter.
The chat wil eventaully be migrated to a webpage that has traditional top and left navigation -- all ISRP related. Short info that is relevant to spontanteous events will be listed in the room Topic.
* Private messages have to go into seperate tabs which is a pain in the butt if you're holding a quiet conversation.
For in-line private discussion, you can use the /notice command. I have not tried this with messaging multiple names.
* New skin makes us look like we should rename it to Interactive Gothic Storytelling Roleplay.
The skin is derived from exisiting D&D art and is not likely to be the last graphic set we have, though it will have to suffice for the immediate future.
 


Qijdi_Goldwing said:
What about standalone chat interface integration? There is an allusion to chatspace providing integration with othwer clients, yet direct link if you would please?

Yes, actually, I am attempting to track that down now. In various steps along the way, I had seen the "downstream" browser interface, but in our custom configuration the typical URL for the HTML version does not apply. I will have to get back to you on this one.
 

Krystal said:
Okay, you seem to be missing the point, Mel. Our complaints are not that we can't send a color to the room for all to see, but that we can't configure how we see it.

Got it. While sending color to a room is possible, (just disabled) there is no way that I know of to set ones own colors. Changing the default colors for everyone of action vs message might be possible.
 

Rhane Arturant said:
But is there no way to make a script at all that brings up a logged/saved description? I know such things exist for IRC and such, can we not come up with something similar for this new chat? I.E even having a logged description pop up in a new tab would work.

There is no way to add additonal "/" commands to the exisiting chat. If there is a way to find a work around within exisiting commands, I am open to hearing it.

Various commands for actions would also be nice. Though I'm partial to "/me" from various years on other chat sites and IRC, it doesn't bother me all that much, but I know so many people that use the colon, ":" or even "/emote" to make an action. Is there any way that we can keep these commands? Or people are going to be mistyping all the time.

Same as above, the commands are set at this point. While we can sometimes change configurations of what exisits, coding new functionality into the chat isn't possible. The product is licensed, not "open source" and therefore we only have access to certain code for configurable items. Akiva needs to fix what is broken (i.e. some people getting whited out text in chat options). But as far as all new functionality, we can not code that into chat anymore than we could code new functionality into any other piece of software one might purchase.

And lastly a request: Mel, is there any way that you could get a username for me? I believe it's been abandoned, but if not, I'd really like it to be made available to me so I can continue to use the chats.

Sure, drop me a line at boards@wizards.com
 

Anamarice said:
ok if we HAVE to register our names here to chat, PLEASE get rid of the "Action requird) e-mail's.

Sorry, these are a security measure, not just against bots signing up automatically, but against folks who like to maliciously sign up accounts that are not theirs.
 

Remove ads

Top