Ferret said:Not good for gaming? Are we talking about serious gaming or just a bit of it?
It's integrated motherboard graphics. It MIGHT be adequate for older games, but don't count on it being good for anything more recent. You really want to look for a discrete graphics chipset. Something like a Radeon x1600 or a GF 6600 mobile is probably the minimum if you have much of any desire to play games. Unfortunately, very few inexpensive laptops have a decent graphics chips.
Ferret said:Plus I plan on upgrading it from 1GB to 2GB does that change anything?
Probably not. RAM is not a substitute for dedicated graphics hardware, any more than a larger gas tank makes your car go faster. That said, integrated graphics DO often suck up some of your system memory for graphics use (the Hypermemory or "Shared" memory). So adding ram can help prevent the integrated graphics from diminishing the amount of available ram to the point where you have too little ram to run at full speed.
Ferret said:Also the NVidia site says it "Plays popular games and applications that use Microsoft® DirectX® 9.0 Shader Model 3.0 effects"
Which is what half-life 2 needs. :\
Not exactly, those sort of "requirements" are best translated as "This is the absolute minimum in order for the program to start up and run." However, if you don't want to be watching a slide show (extremely low frame rate) with no graphical bells and whistles, then you usually need considerably more than the "requirements".
Ferret said:Although, the HP one has a 7 series which supports all that and HDR which means its got to be right... Which to choose?
The HP one has just ended :\
Here's a guide to Nvidia's chipsets, you will want to look at the mobile units towards the bottom. Presumably there's a similar page for the ATI Radeon offerings.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_NVIDIA_Graphics_Processing_Units
The HP has an NVIDIA® GeForce Go 7400 is decent.