Denaes said:
You seem to imply that you chop up rules peacemeal. That would render the Wiki relatively useless.
It doesn't make it useless, but it makes it harder to use as anything other than a reference.
Denaes said:
For example, a few feats from Spycraft 2.0 arn't very balanced. You really need them all or you have a lopsided Feat array. Now most the feats won't make sense as they apply to rules specific to Spycraft 2.0 such as Lifestyle, Appearance, Final Attacks, Gear, Action Dice, etc. They play off of the classes and the classes in turn play off the feats.
Even with visually compatable rules (they don't obviously look out of place) you face the fact that three rules would look totally stupid seperate, but make sense together.
As a user, you could annotate the rules to indicate that they require or work well with certain other rules. You could create a subsystem page that links disparate rules that need each other. Regardless of how you do it, the sheer volume of material means it will never be the same as picking up a book that rules designed to work together in the first place.
I've used such a wiki for my personal campaign setting, and I can tell you that a wiki is not as convenient as picking up a book. What gives it power and makes it useful is that I can, for instance, cross-reference rules from multiple materials. I can categorize feats from different sources and realize that I have six that do the same thing and should therefore cull some.
The power of the wiki is that I can figure out which books to bring to the table for given session. I can search for common terms and organize the rules for my usage patterns. My players can fix issues and incorporate errata and generally comment about the suitability and playability of everything I want to use.
I have over 300 books in my personal library, several dozen PDFs, and a ton of original material. Only the wiki allows me to actually leverage all that material and use it effectively. Sharing that power (and work) with the gaming community would multiply that effect. I'm not going to ever open that wiki as is because it's too far from the original source material (I've pushed and pulled and twisted the material over time to integrate it deeper into my setting), but setting up a pale shadow seeded with the SRD would be trivial.
I mean, seriously, a wiki is going to be even less threat than piracy for a publisher. With the wiki, someone will need to cut and paste and organize all the content into a single document to get hold of your work; if they want it that bad it's a lot less work to get the PDF off any file sharing hub. On top of which cutting and pasting doesn't get them the art, closed content, or feel of the original.
Go over to d20srd.org sometime; imagine cutting and pasting all of that to get the Player's Handbook. But see how useful it is when you just need to look something up or when researching the impact of a rules change. A wiki is going to do that on a huge scale (and cut things up even finer because of its nature) for hundreds of books.