Well, good.Just FYI, a set of posts went up on the DDB twitter feed. They are acknowledging that, based on feedback so far, the draft OGL 1.2 'hasn't hit the mark' and that the 'draft VTT policy missed the mark'.
And that's based on more than 10,000 responses!Just FYI, a set of posts went up on the DDB twitter feed. They are acknowledging that, based on feedback so far, the draft OGL 1.2 'hasn't hit the mark' and that the 'draft VTT policy missed the mark'.
I'm wondering, or rather I should say hoping, if there's a pro-OGL "faction" within WotC management and if they might use the survey as a tool to try and push their view.
If every "vote with your wallet" is to be met with a "don't do that, it'll punish the employees, and if you're not a customer they don't care already anyway" comment, there really isn't a any way to hold corporations accountable, is there?Everytime someone advices tonboycott forever, we play into the cards of the probably higher ups who think we are not the target group anymore.
That last bullet is so key. Even if lawyers can debate over the first two, it's so obvious that they stepped on a third rail that they didn't even realize was there.
I think the 1.2 draft was a big step forward, but I cannot imagine that anyone who responded to the survey said they felt comfortable actually publishing under it.10thousand responses to the survey.
I know they’ve been seeing the signers to the various petitions. Just the opendnd one is over sixty thousand signatures.
#OpenDND
www.opendnd.games
I would be very surprised if there weren't such a faction.I'm wondering, or rather I should say hoping, if there's a pro-OGL "faction" within WotC management and if they might use the survey as a tool to try and push their view.
And that's just the way they like it.If every "vote with your wallet" is to be met with a "don't do that, it'll punish the employees, and if you're not a customer they don't care already anyway" comment, there really isn't a any way to hold corporations accountable, is there?