Okay, where do you stand on diagonal movement?

[fafhrd]

Xorn - watch the language. I'm not sure how that got through the filters; I edited it manually.

If there is a reasonable expectation that colorful language is going to be filtered, how is it his fault?

On Topic: I've always used 1-1-1 when I'm running the game. So long as the 'no diagonal cornering' rule is followed, it hasn't presented any problems.

 

[Wormwood]

But battle maps are icky, have cooties, and smell like butts.

We're in complete agreement on this point.

 

[dmccoy1693]

1-2-1-2 as per 3E

 

[parvatiquinta]

Uhm, I'm new here and I don't know if there's any kind of greeting custom or such.

I voted I'd bypass the issue, but I do have one question. Why didn't you set an option for 1.5-1.5-1.5-1.5?
(no, I'm not being ironic or sarcastic. just asking.)

 

[Lord Fyre]

Can I say that I stand at an angle? Or that at least I am leaning that way?

 

[Kid Charlemagne]

If there is a reasonable expectation that colorful language is going to be filtered, how is it his fault?

Totally true - we've edited the filter so that it won't happen again. If I were blaming him, he'd be gone for a few days. As it is, we're chalking it up to expecting the filter to edit it out. We're all cool. Still, best not to curse in the first place.

 

[jeffh]

Uhm, I'm new here and I don't know if there's any kind of greeting custom or such.

I voted I'd bypass the issue, but I do have one question. Why didn't you set an option for 1.5-1.5-1.5-1.5?
(no, I'm not being ironic or sarcastic. just asking.)

Because I'd never seen anyone defend it until a little earlier today, and because I don't see how it differs from 1-2-1-2 in practise.

 

[Dragonklaw82]

1-2-1-2-1 makes more sense.

1-1-1-1-1 sounds like more fun.

 

[cr0m]

1-1-2-3-5-8-13-21-etc

 

[keterys]

Ooh, fibonacci would totally encourage little tactical movements while ensuring creatures don't move too far. And total mathematical orgasm. Yeah, clearly that's the way to go