Ashtal said:
Just because you can't score a goal or have the fastest time doesn't mean it's not a sport.
Well, I will point out that I only really advocated eliminating the most corrupt and rotten of all the judged sports: figure skating. I don't like the others, and think they diminish the accomplishments of athletes who actually win their medals rather than having them judged into their hands, but I would be satisfied at the start with just getting rid of the unholy blight that is figure skating.
But the subjective marking does inhibit its legitimacy - no question about it. But to dump all these sports, and skating isn't the only one that is subjective...all the skiing that isn't about the fastest time, snowboarding, most of the gymnastics, so many other sports, too, would all be cut.
Um, yeah, I noted that. In a perfect world of my own arranging, these would all be tossed. I don't expect that to happen, so I contented myself with advocating the elimination of the worst offender, but if I could make the decisions, diving, gymnastics, rhythmic gymnastics, half-pipe snowboarding, syncronized swimming and everything else like that would be eliminated from Olympic competition.
And there is corruption in the Point & Speed games, too. How many times do we complain of poor judging in a boxing match (something highly personal and subjective, depending on your interests and literal point of view)
Boxing, by its very nature is corrupt. The professional ranks of boxing are entirely and hopelessly corrupt to the point where it is likely irretrievable, and has become essentially irrelevant (there was a time when the undiputed heavyweight champion of the world was a rock star like celebrity, most peopl don't even know who holds the various titles now). Olympic boxing has progressed to the point where it has gotten almost silly, but at least there are
some objective standards. mechanical scoring isn't the answer there either, does anyone else remember the machine scoring debacle in Barcelona? Boxing is right on the bordeline of being lumped in with the various wholly judged sports like gymnastics.
, or hockey/football games, or whathaveyou. Should we chuck those sports out, too? Certainly bad calls make those unfair matches in many cases.
But the scoring is not
wholly and
completeley dependent upon the judges. A referee in a hockey match, or basketball game, or team handball game is supposed to ensure that the rules are followed by the players. A referee does
not decide one side should win and one side should lose based entirely on his own judgment. Their actions
can make a difference, and if they make a bad call they could influence the outcome of a game, but they aren't
supposed to. In figure skating, everything hinges on the judge's determinations, they are
expected to decide the winner, as opposed to a hockey referee who is
expected not to do so.
I say leave 'em in and retool them. Personally, I don't think any judge should be judging their own country's entrants into the match. You shouldn't have more than one judge from each country (there were two Russians, for example). A fall should automatically drop a skater or pair down one rank. Or whatever.
Except that figure skating already has automatic deductions and other similar rules. And those rules are routinely ignored, or the judges rig their voting in areas such as "artistic performance" such that they offset their technical performance scores and get the result they wanted anyway, regardless of what the "rules" say. I just don't think that there is any fair way to judge these competitions, especially when you introduce highly subjective elements into the scoring that are based on personal taste, like "artistic performance" and so on.
I don't accept that because a sport has issues with its judging that it should be thrown out whole cloth. If we do, then they all gotta go.
Okay, then they all gotta go. I'm with you there.