candidus_cogitens
Explorer
Everybody knows that if you multiclass, it often works really nice at low levels but there is a risk that it doesnt turn out to be as powerful at higher levels. Of course, in some cases, this is not a problem. Like, if you are a fighter/ranger, or fighter/barbarian ... no problem. But if you're a wizard, why would you want to take one level in cleric?!
Rogue can be a nice class to just take one level in--but its better to do it at first level, because only then do you get the advantage of 4 x 8 skill points.
Bard is questionable, if you ask me. Of course, if you're other class is rogue or monk you still have Perform as a class skill and you can continue to get new bardic music abilities even if you never take another level as a bard.
Fighter can be a nice choice because you get that bonus feat, and of course, if you dont already have martail weapons proficiencies you would get that.
Sorcerer might be alright, if you select your spells properly.
What about the psionics classes? Do any of them work well as one-level-only multiclass choices?
What do you think would be wise or unwise choices for this kind of multiclassing strategy?
Rogue can be a nice class to just take one level in--but its better to do it at first level, because only then do you get the advantage of 4 x 8 skill points.
Bard is questionable, if you ask me. Of course, if you're other class is rogue or monk you still have Perform as a class skill and you can continue to get new bardic music abilities even if you never take another level as a bard.
Fighter can be a nice choice because you get that bonus feat, and of course, if you dont already have martail weapons proficiencies you would get that.
Sorcerer might be alright, if you select your spells properly.
What about the psionics classes? Do any of them work well as one-level-only multiclass choices?
What do you think would be wise or unwise choices for this kind of multiclassing strategy?