OotS 449

SPoD said:
Theoretically? Because incorporeal attacks are stopped by Mage Armor, and touch attacks are not.

Mage armor is an oddball, in that it's not a real armor but a force field. That and shield are the only protective force effects I know off that aren't deflection.

So, yeah, if you want to be very strict and rule-lawyery, incorporeal attacks shouldn't be called "touch attack". But it's kinda arguing for arguing's sake.

An incorporeal creature’s attacks pass through (ignore) natural armor, armor, and shields, although deflection bonuses and force effects (such as mage armor) work normally against it.​
&
Some attacks disregard armor, including shields and natural armor. In these cases, the attacker makes a touch attack roll (either ranged or melee). When you are the target of a touch attack, your AC doesn’t include any armor bonus, shield bonus, or natural armor bonus. All other modifiers, such as your size modifier, Dexterity modifier, and deflection bonus (if any) apply normally.​
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Wohooo. Guess it's time for another "Redcloak wears Xykon around on his neck" episode.

And Reddles will not stop to remind Xykon of his foolishness!
 



Kahuna Burger said:
He will at some point in the future come within (?)100 ft(?) of one of the other gates, so yes, he will. ;)

Excellent! :)

Xykon is without doubt my favourite OOTS villain, far preferred to Red Cloak, Nale and the Linear Guild.
 

Kahuna Burger said:
He will at some point in the future come within (?)100 ft(?) of one of the other gates, so yes, he will. ;)

he will be within 1000ft of Girard's gate at some point. a "desert gate, behind an endless series of cunning illusions, relying on the power of deception to protect the gate."
 





Remove ads

Top