OotS 477 is up!

Greylock said:
So, Rich coming straight out and saying Belkar is evil means... nothing to you?

I think what Vraille is saying is that while Belkar is evil, his players character sheet has CN listed on it - because most players who play CN actually play their characters as evil.

I don't agree - because Belkar clearly knows he's evil, or he wouldn't carry around that sheet of lead!
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Greylock said:
So, Rich coming straight out and saying Belkar is evil means... nothing to you?
It means something to me but it's something about how authors shouldn't read their own creation's messageboards rather than about Belkar's alignment. ;) (which I think is Evil, but redeemable by sneaking up ion him in his sleep and putting a periapt of wisdom +4 or so around his neck.)
 

WarlockLord said:
Seriously, for all you 'avatar of the snarl' people, do god-killing abberations play with Transformers?

That's just it, no one knows what Snarls do in their free time when they are not destroying Gods and mortals.
 

Nifft said:
- Belkar has fewer than 11 levels of Ranger.

Yeah, he has 9, precisely, at this point.

There's no other way he could have exactly 5 attacks.

There certainly are a few options... like Whirling Frenzy, Boots of Speed, Daggers of Speed, etc.

But he's probably a Ranger 9th / Barbarian 2nd - 6th.

Bye
Thanee
 




Thanee said:
A question to you people of nearly unlimited OotSy knowledge... who is this O-Chul guy, again? :uhoh:

Bye
Thanee

Paladin in charge of the Sapphire guard who defended the throne from Xykon. Xykon paralyzed him right before he could strike the gem to stop Xykon from taking it. He watched the ghost fight, miko's shattering of the gem, and the explosion that knocked him out to the monster's tea party.
 


Pets & Sidekicks

Remove ads

Top