While I plan on giving to Gary when the opportunity arises, I must agree with Rel, withholding from people who deserve it is the exact opposite of what the XP system is for.
That is correct but, just to play devil's advocate here (although I do have a relevant point), aren't the top 4 above Gary already well aware of their awesomeness that got them there? They are firmly entrenched at the top, and deservedly so but... are there any more deserving of the top spot than The Man himself? Would the witty comments and great photoshops even matter without the game that inspired them?
When a newbie first comes to the board and discovers the xp system- and they look at the rankings, they probably think "Who the hell is THAT guy at the top?" Shouldn't their next thought be "Holy crap! That's Gary Gygax! Cool!"- instead of "What the heck is a weem?"No offense to weem of course, he's great (as are all the Top 4) but he's no Gary Gygax.
Ultimately- yes, give xp where xp is due- that's what it's for. But for the Top 4, they know they're the top, and they earned their spot there, but... before you click that xp button you might legitimately ask, should they really be higher than Gary?

give xp where xp is due
for the record, a deciweem has been hit by inflation and is now 147.8 xp.
A decitraz is 130.9 Xp. The Col. has reched the 1k Xp point and continues as he is at 1014 at the time of this post.
So a deciGax is 100 xp? Or would that be a deciPlado?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.