PCs Still Kicking Puppies OOC [CLOSED, original players still welcome]

[Fangor the Fierce]

Aligor Thunderaxe Male Dwarf Fighter/Barbarian

Very true, and I had forgotten about her... I would have to see how she interacts in the group more but there might be a girl in the party who would be in trouble after all.

She's active, but I don't see her "boyfriends" living to long or having to many partners after her so her stock isn't that high.

Looking at the current group and its evilness, I think I might have to step up my actions to more vile than they currently are...

 

[Goddess FallenAngel]

Looking at the current group and its evilness, I think I might have to step up my actions to more vile than they currently are...

Don't worry, I think that you are still worse than my character. Other than being half-demonic, she's the most normally-motivated one of all of you. Besides Aeweth/Rhesa, that is.

 

[Brother Shatterstone]

Looking at the current group and its evilness, I think I might have to step up my actions to more vile than they currently are...

Fanger, this isn't about out doing the other players Its simply about having fun with your character, and how you envision him.

Accalon, has a very evil core but never displays it and I’m not going to try and change him to say compete with Gwyn’s desires to mutilate people...

Simply be evil in the way that fits your character.

 

[Paxus Asclepius]

Gwyn doesn't like mutilating people; he rather regrets it if they're attractive. He prefers emotional scarring to physical.

 

[Telsar]

Looking at the current group and its evilness, I think I might have to step up my actions to more vile than they currently are...

Brother Shatterstone pretty much already said this, but your DM agrees: you don't have to out-vile anyone. But feel free if you think it's in character.

I personally don't plan on describing anything too vile myself, maybe 'cause I'm squeamish (your characters scare the heck out of me ), but also because I don't want anyone to feel they have to go by any particular standard of vileness. I'm not encouraging, or limiting, any character's despicability (is that a word?).

 

[Brother Shatterstone]

I'm not encouraging, or limiting, any character's despicability (is that a word?).

Yes it is:

despicability - n : unworthiness by virtue of lacking higher values.

 

[Thomas Hobbes]

Well, you must realize that in her mind, humans are bestiality. See, you are an inferior race. Unless you have demonic blood (or, preferably, are full-blooded demonic), she's not interested.

Out of curisoity, what would she think of an Aasimar? Purely an academic question, I assure you. It's just that I seem to recall Gwyn simply holds in contempt humans (Paxus- what's he think of Elves, etc? Is it all mortals or what?) and anything more than human is potentially worthy of respect.

Other than being half-demonic, she's the most normally-motivated one of all of you. Besides Aeweth/Rhesa, that is.

I'm not so sure. Rhesa tries to thumb her nose at the gods and say "Nah nah! I'm neutral!" That strikes me as fairly odd, if not as twisted as some others. Truth be told, the "balance" aspect of True Neutral is something I've never seen played and something I've never "gotten." Who can think like that? It seems foriegn to me. If you recognize good and evil as concepts, there's little to gain philosophically or otherwise by balancing them. Good is, well, good. Rhesa doesn't think that, but she's the closest I've ever seen.

 

[Brother Shatterstone]

Truth be told, the "balance" aspect of True Neutral is something I've never seen played and something I've never "gotten." Who can think like that?

It strikes me as weird and foreign also… :\ The quick answer in my opinion is the country of Switzerland, whom is well known for their neutrality, but even there neutrality is based in something other than balance good versus evil… They dimply don’t want to choose a side that’s going to cost them politically or finically…

 

[Thomas Hobbes]

That kind of True Neutral I can get; it's the "balance" kind that I don't understand.

Also, if you're going to be unavailable for six to seven days, I'll probably have to NPC you. I'll keep it as simple as possible, but any ideas you have on what Aeweth would do or say, that you could tell me in advance, would help.

Will do, but I'll wait until we get on a bit so I can see where we are. Mostly I expect the suggestions will be along the lines of "Don't get prostituted."

...your characters scare the heck out of me ....

What, even lil' Aeweth?

As an aside: wow. That's not just evil. That's diabolical. (See Pax's entry. Not our Pax, although he might be jealous.)

 

[Paxus Asclepius]

The city destroying is pretty violent, I agree; definitely destructive, rather barbaric. It's a good Machiavellian scheme. On the other hand, it lacks the personal touch of, say, this bit that Gwyn did (in another game). Be warned, extremely vile, though the highly esteemed GM managed to avoid saying anything explicit enough to be problematic.