Psion said:Need... multiple... choices.
Change his alignment to Chaotic Stupid and just hand it back to him. He should probably be just fine with it.jeff37923 said:Oh, yes. We definitely need multiple choices.
I've seen all of the above kill player characters. Although I'm DMing a 13-year old now in a game and it is opening up new vistas of actions and consequences I'd never even concieved before ("I strip off all my clothes and walk into the Baron's audience chamber naked! - What do you mean the guards arrest me for that?", "My alignment is neutral so I'm going to flip a coin to see if I'll be good or evil just like Two-Face! Tails! I attack the nearest party member! - What do you mean the rest of the party is trying to kill me for attacking them?").
It's an eye-opener, that's for sure.
Agreed.Psion said:Need... multiple... choices."
Vampiric touch has no save.Aeson said:I tried to sneak up on him and use my last spell, Vampiric touch. He saved and turned around and used death touch or harm on me thus killing me.
That in a lot of ways would be inter-party conflict - failure to co-operate leading to PPKS'mon said:Most PC deaths I saw were caused by inappropriate cowardice from the most powerful PCs; especially the Wizard who teleported away when anything bad happened.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.