Mort_Q said:Would an active roll for Perception happen without a Passive Perception check? For the same thing?
It's up to the DM, but wouldn't you only really by making an roll because your passive check was too low?
That's in direct contradiction to the general feeling in this thread, if you're implying that you get either an Active or a Passive check, but not both.Falling Icicle said:Passive Perception is just like taking 10 in 3rd edition. It could be better or worse than what you would have rolled.
Ulorian said:That's in direct contradiction to the general feeling in this thread, if you're implying that you get either an Active or a Passive check, but not both.
??? I understand how it works, thanks. I think you misread what I wrote.D'karr said:You basically get both. The DM will roll anything he is "hiding" against your Passive Perception. He will give you the information based on that. The player can choose to roll his Perception, at which time it becomes an Active roll.
If the player rolls lower than the Passive, he just won't find anything else that had not been already described.
This allows players to notice traps, for example, without having to constantly tell the DM, "I'm searching for traps." This would also be the way that "elves" would find secret doors as a racial ability. They don't have to actively search. I'm not saying elves have or don't have that ability, it is just an example.
small pumpkin man said:No. Passive is generally for when someone else is rolling, it's there because opposed rolls are much more swingy and random than a single roll vs a DC, only using passive perception in those situations means that your example will never come up.
It's all part of the project to unify the rules.