You keep repeating this, when it's not true.
Point #7 - ((Obviously I'm not exact quoting here)) calls for new authors to rewrite the problematic sections of the work from an "in universe" perspective which would reveal the crudities of the Gazetteer to be "false propoganda"
I'm sorry, but how is this not "rewriting" the product. It's right there in point 7 that the intention is to rewrite the product. You continuously repeating that it's not doesn't change the fact that
@Dungeonosophy has specifically called for the work to be rewritten. It doesn't matter that the rewrites are bundled with the original text - it's STILL rewriting the product.