"Should mean"? Yes, that is correct
deductive reasoning. However, does it break the
actual rule? No, it doesnt.
You say I'm argueing symantics. What I say is that you are using loose symantics to prove a specific point. Becoming a god inside Sigil is not a loophole to the Lady's "dictate" that gods cannot enter Sigil because a god
did not enter Sigil. This isn't symantics; It's fact. The two are completely different things and one does not invalidate the other, which a loophole would do to some extent (even if just temporarily).
Actually, I jumped in because of the whining against canon and to explain LoP's purpose as a source of campaign stability. Probably stuck around too long after that...
Actually, I think most of us on both sides have.
More for me!