"Should mean"?  Yes, that is correct 
deductive reasoning.  However, does it break the 
actual rule?  No, it doesnt.
 
You say I'm argueing symantics.  What I say is that you are using loose symantics to prove a specific point.  Becoming a god inside Sigil is not a loophole to the Lady's "dictate" that gods cannot enter Sigil because a god 
did not enter Sigil.  This isn't symantics; It's fact.  The two are completely different things and one does not invalidate the other, which a loophole would do to some extent (even if just temporarily).
 
Actually, I jumped in because of the whining against canon and to explain LoP's purpose as a source of campaign stability.  Probably stuck around too long after that...
 
Actually, I think most of us on both sides have.
 
More for me!