Please rate Off-Hand Parry

Rate the usefulness/must have of Off-Hand Parry

  • 1 - You should never take this feat

    Votes: 16 27.6%
  • 2- Not very useful

    Votes: 8 13.8%
  • 3- of limited use

    Votes: 15 25.9%
  • 4- below average

    Votes: 3 5.2%
  • 5- Average

    Votes: 4 6.9%
  • 6- above average

    Votes: 4 6.9%
  • 7- above average and cool

    Votes: 4 6.9%
  • 8- good

    Votes: 2 3.4%
  • 9- Very good

    Votes: 2 3.4%
  • 10- Everyone should take this feat

    Votes: 0 0.0%

My problem with this feat is that you can use a shield as an off-hand weapon to bash. Getting a +2 dodge bonus to AC for using a shield as, well, as a shield seems a bit fishy to me.

That reminds me of a few questions: when using a shield to bash as an off-hand weapon, which weapon proficiency do you use: Shield Proficiency or Martial Weapon Proficiency (shield)? Also, can you get Weapon Focus (shield)?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

JChung2003 said:


That reminds me of a few questions: when using a shield to bash as an off-hand weapon, which weapon proficiency do you use: Shield Proficiency or Martial Weapon Proficiency (shield)? Also, can you get Weapon Focus (shield)?

You use Shield Proficiency. There is no Martial Weapon Proficiency: Shield.

And you can't get Weapon Focus: Shield, but you can get Weapon Focus: Shield Bash. Kind of like you can't get Weapon Focuse: Fist but you can get Weapon Focus: Unarmed Strike.
 

Let's do a comparison:

Off-Hand Parry + Buckler= +3 AC + enhancement bonus of buckler (someone forgot that buckler can be enhanced- oops!)
Large Shield= +2 AC + enhancement bonus of large shield

So, whilst used, Off-Hand Parry is clearly superior to the 'next best option', and better than Dodge (which only gives +1 AC vs. one opponent)

There are also several advantages when compared with Shield Basher:

Weapon can be enhanced to increase damage; Shield cannot. This also means Shield Basher is hamstrung against foes with damage reduction.
OHP wielder has a better arcane failure and armour check penalty than Shield Basher.
OHP wielder is more subtle than Shield Basher (see Silveraxe)
OHP wielder can be a viable Duelist; Shield Basher cannot (see Silveraxe again)
Shield Basher cannot use weapon feats, as a Shield is not technically a weapon.

In other words, Shield Basher has several problems. The irony is that Shield Basher, if attacking, receives a -2 to hit. OHP man does not, as he is not actually using his off-hand weapon if using OHP. So, if anything is trumped by Expertise, it is Shield Basher. Of course, if Shield Basher chooses not to Shield Bash, then he is inferior to OHP man in terms of defence. If he chooses to Shield Bash, the -2 to hit probably means he would be better off simply going for standard sword-and-shield with Power Attack. Offensively, he is clearly inferior to the two-weapon attacker due to the two-weapon attacker's ability to use weapon feats with his off-hand weapon and to have magic weapons- the +1 AC (as compared with buckler) is not worthwhile.
 

Remove ads

Top