Thanee said:You add the effect of one on top of the other (to derive duration), how is that not stacking?
Or in other words, it's impossible to derive the effect with the second casting alone, so it obviously needs to be stacked on top of the first to get there.
Diirk said:By that reasoning a druid can't be the subject animal growth after he polymorphs into an animal (even if its the same size as him, so we don't confuse the issue with the multiple size changing argument), as the second spell can't exist on the target without the first, so clearly its stacked...
Same Effect with Differing Results
The same spell can sometimes produce varying effects if applied to the same recipient more than once. Usually the last spell in the series trumps the others. None of the previous spells are actually removed or dispelled, but their effects become irrelevant while the final spell in the series lasts.
One Effect Makes Another Irrelevant
Sometimes, one spell can render a later spell irrelevant. Both spells are still active, but one has rendered the other useless in some fashion.
Thanee said:The similarity is, that I believe the prerequisites should be met all the time, not just once at the beginning and then forgotten about.
Bye
Thanee
Thanee said:How so?
Bye
Thanee
SRD said:Target: One touched nonmagical oak club or quarterstaff
...
Your own nonmagical club or quarterstaff becomes a weapon with a +1 enhancement bonus on attack and damage rolls. (A quarterstaff gains this enhancement for both ends of the weapon.)
Eeeek! ...not this again.....Thanee said:How so?

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.