Prostylizing...erh I mean Polling for Recruits! [Scarred Land Interest]

[Nightfall]

Well seeing how I'm fairly bored today, and my creativity for the day is pretty much kaput, I was hoping to see who on these lovely boards here who here is a fan of the Scarred Lands or at least some product that has Scarred lands in it. Btw, you can like OTHER settings more. I know you kooky KoKers are out there but please, don't hesistate expressing SOME liking for SL. Also I'm willing to have pot shot taken at me, as I know I'm a little...exhuberant in my like. (Btw, arcady if you read this thread, you are MORE than welcome to respond with criticisms. Today I consider you a very DECENT human being.)


Anyway vote, comment flame, do what ever you feel. I just like to hear you all comment your like and/or dislike for the Scarred Lands. Don't worry I will not tolerate ANY name calling, snide remarks or any such thing. This isn't the place for it, and I WILL have PC shut it down if it gets out of hand.

 

[Psion]

Of course I like it. R&R is one of the best 3rd party published d20 system books, and the others aren't too shabby either.

But it could REALLY use a real setting book and players guide, and it is long overdue.

 

[Nightfall]

Three more Months Psion. I promise you, there will be a setting book for at least Ghelspad. The HC should alleviate alot of the worry and misunderstanding for the DMs out there. I do think the softback for Ghelspad is a good starter for PCs out there.

But I'm glad you like it. As I said, my creativity today has been shot to hell.

 

[Alaric_Prympax]

Eventhough I am a born and bred Greyhawker I like SL and have every product the S&S has made for it. It is the best supported setting out there IMO, though KoK has a lot too.

One of my players wants to DM the group in SL and I'm looking forward to that.

 

[Piratecat]

Scarred Lands is the first published campaign setting I've used in 20+ years. It's superb - bursting with potential, good themes, well written and innovative supplements, and lots of sneaky nastiness. I have a campaign only for new players, with eight players (seven of them women, five of them new to role playing.) They really like it, and I can't help but agree.

 

[Maerdwyn]

Don't use any published settings, though I use some stuff from R&R, and will pick up more stuff if my budget allows.

 

[333 Dave]

Flame: YOU FORGOT THE "OTHER" OPTION! HOW COULD YOU FORGET %*^%& OTHER!

Really, I've heard of Scarred Lands, so I'm not ignorant enough to vote the third choice, but as I've never purchased any products for it I could not honestly vote either way. So You should have an other or at least a "Not sure" option. And you invited flames .

 

[Cullain]

While I prefer using my own homebrew, Scarred Lands is easily the best 3rd party setting I've seen for 3E. Well supported(though I agree, the HC is long overdue), and with a lot of unique takes on D&D tradition. I've bought all the books, and haven't been dissapointed yet.

Cullain

 

[Blood Jester]

Scarred Lands is the first published campaign setting I've used in 20+ years. It's superb - bursting with potential, good themes, well written and innovative supplements, and lots of sneaky nastiness. I have a campaign only for new players, with eight players (seven of them women, five of them new to role playing.) They really like it, and I can't help but agree.

Hey, what ever happened to the Story Hour for that game? I kept checking back for a long time, but the thread seemed to only be one long joke. I finally decided you had been pulling our legs and gave up. (The seven of eight ratio helped me think you were kidding!)

 

[Piratecat]

Hey, what ever happened to the Story Hour for that game?

No joke, but I never had time to do the story hour properly. The players took it over, and were posting it on the old boards; I believe we'll be posting it on these boards as well, as soon as they get dug out of a ailing computer's hard drive. It's a really, really fun game.