Infiniti2000
First Post
Do you agree with the notion that if a word doesn't have a game definition, then you use the normal English definition (or the most applicable definition)? If so, then I think my interpretation of unique is the correct one and certainly not overly restrictive. It's adequately restrictive. If not, then what do you do?Nail said:This assertion has come up before, in other threads about gate. As the RAW doesn't explicitly define "unique" (it's not a game term or category, like "solitary"), it seems unsupported and overly restrictive to call a named individual of a species unique. But, YMMV.
So, then, give us an in-character summons for a 34HD solar and one for a 35HD solar and we can see how you would differentiate them without metagaming. I'm willing to be proven wrong, but I don't think you can say "34 hit dice" without it being a game mechanic. At best, it would be something like "send me a powerful solar" at which point the DM could choose any advanced solar, but it certainly wouldn't be a 34HD solar specifically.Nail said:Whereas I think it's just being smart - something I hope you all think your PCs would be. Although my PC may not use the term "hit dice", he can't help but observe and understand the concept within the gaming world.