Yes, a rule book that isn't required to play or listed in the Core books is a "definitive authority". WotC pretzel logic?
Ranged Sneak Attack While Hidden
- Thread starter Rethalgamon
- Start date
Yes, a rule book that isn't required to play or listed in the Core books is a "definitive authority". WotC pretzel logic?
Vegepygmy
First Post
Apparently, you missed that I was referring to errata, rather than the Rules Compendium. But the same "pretzel logic" applies (which was my point).
If you really want to argue that errata is not more definitive authority than the publication it corrects, I'll just move along, because there's no reasoning with you.
You haven't made a case for it being more definitive, other than parroting perhaps, WotC people who also lied about 4.0 release...
How do you view errata?
Errata is not part of the core rules and wasn't included in the core books.
Is it an official rule change?
If so, then why would the rules compendium be treated as different - it specifically states that it includes errata.
Vegepygmy
First Post
Apparently, he views them as "lies" from WotC.
Unless it is fixing a typo I treat it as a house rule. Same as splat books.
And therein lies the crux of the difference between how you interpret things and the majority of the rest of us (and WoTC) does.
I wasn't intending to do so.
Kask, I apologize if any of my comments came across that way.
Not at all. You are very civil.
Similar Threads
D&D (2024)
Creating good stealth rules for 2024 5e
