Wow! Just proves my point about the luxury items example. If you want an Enzo Ferrari, there's onlyfroggie said:No reprint--it would be unfair to the folks that bought them
froggie said:Amazon orders? Screw them...I support FLGS. Buy local.
Alzrius said:'Mismanagement'? As I recall, Clark himself posted and said that even by selling out the entire print run of 1,000, they were barely getting back more than it cost them to do this in the first place. Their forecast about selling out was absolutely spot on, and it's quite likely that the print run was determined by being optimal to what would make a profit. They knew exactly what they were doing.
Because you don't know more people want it until after you've made your (largely fixed-cost) upfront investment and sold out of your first printing. How many copies do you print in your second run? What happens if you don't quite sell them all?Sammael said:I personally think that it's INSANE to print gaming products in limited editions*. If more people want it, why not cater to them?
My understanding from following this situation is that the 'attitude' has no bearing on whether Amazon can get the product or not--it was stated earlier than Amazon is not being prevented from acquiring RAR. As I understand it's a simple case that there are only 1000 copies (and a significant portion being sold at Gen Con), and Amazon is too big to be able to make the effort to get a product like this--the total profit from it for Amazon (or any similar mass-market giant) is simply too small for them to make an effort (Harry Potter is much more important for them; even the D&D 3.5 PHB is much more on their radar). Smaller game shops (either Brick and Mortor or online) are able to target the product specifically and bag it.Ogrork the Mighty said:If I'd known that was the attitude, I wouldn't have ordered from Amazon. :\
The trick is, knowing how many people will buy it before deciding on the print run. I'm sure many publishers would be willing to testify that if they could do this better their businesses would run much better.Numion said:Optimal number to print is the number of people that would buy it. How is it better to print 1000 if 1500 people would've bought it?
It's often much, much better to print 1000 if you estimate that 1500 will buy it, because your estimate is far from perfect.Numion said:Optimal number to print is the number of people that would buy it. How is it better to print 1000 if 1500 people would've bought it?
Sammael said:I personally think that it's INSANE to print gaming products in limited editions*. If more people want it, why not cater to them? This marketing strategy creates unwarranted elitism.