cbwjm
Legend
In rereading Queen of the black Coast at the moment, really doesn't seem as bad as you're making it out to be.Re-read The Scarlet Citadel, Queen of the Black Coast, and/or Vale of Lost Women.
I'm not talking about "vocabulary".
In rereading Queen of the black Coast at the moment, really doesn't seem as bad as you're making it out to be.Re-read The Scarlet Citadel, Queen of the Black Coast, and/or Vale of Lost Women.
I'm not talking about "vocabulary".
Not weighing in on this particular story but you guys might want to make sure you are discussing the same edition of it, some Conan anthologies are edited for modern sensibilities and done use the original textIn rereading Queen of the black Coast at the moment, really doesn't seem as bad as you're making it out to be.
The one in reading is from weird tales from Gutenberg project. The language is dated, but it doesn't seem that bad considering when it was written.Not weighing in on this particular story but you guys might want to make sure you are discussing the same edition of it, some Conan anthologies are edited for modern sensibilities and done use the original text
How Howard talks about we black people is almost always racist. Its k tho, I still love his stuff. Just wish he didnt see us as giant, stupid, aggressive ape menIn rereading Queen of the black Coast at the moment, really doesn't seem as bad as you're making it out to be.
It's really distasteful. I found in reading the Solomon Kane tales a weird contrast between how Howard wrote about Darkest Africa and its people on one hand, vs the way he and Kane regard the shaman N'Longa, who while exoticized is still viewed as a man and a peer, someone worthy of respect and possessing essential human dignity. That there is a kinship of spirit between the two men. There seemed to me a bit of egalitarianism in those parts of the text struggling/at odds with the racist aspects.How Howard talks about we black people is almost always racist. Its k tho, I still love his stuff. Just wish he didnt see us as giant, stupid, aggressive ape men
There is a similar attitude in Rider Haggard's King Solomon's Mines. I think it represents a kind of doublethink between learned racist attitudes and an intelligent author thinking about an actual character.It's really distasteful. I found in reading the Solomon Kane tales a weird contrast between how Howard wrote about Darkest Africa and its people on one hand, vs the way he and Kane regard the shaman N'Longa, who while exoticized is still viewed as a man and a peer, someone worthy of respect and possessing essential human dignity. That there is a kinship of spirit between the two men. There seemed to me a bit of egalitarianism in those parts of the text struggling/at odds with the racist aspects.
You bring up a valid point. The problem doesn't just lie in a few words but in how an author might describe and treat black characters. In Lovecraft's Herbert West - Reanimator, one of my favorite stories of his, it's not the racist name he gives to the cat that bothers me the most. It's his hateful description of the black boxer which perfectly matches your description above.How Howard talks about we black people is almost always racist. Its k tho, I still love his stuff. Just wish he didnt see us as giant, stupid, aggressive ape men
REH's philosophy and views on life are all over his writing. His dislikes of civilization and authority, his belief in past lives, the inevitable rise and fall of peoples, and yes, his more problematic views. All the stuff he writes about in his letters shows up in his stories. It's ironic, considering there are plenty of people that laud Sword and Sorcery for supposedly being just action and adventure, with no deeper meaning.But I really don't think that kind of writing provides any insights into the man's thinking.
Actually, getting back to the actual topic, Queen of the Black Coast is a great example of early influence on DnD, some of the sample adventure locations are lost cities, that's mainly what this one is about. It also showcases ancient curses, and perhaps enchantment. I'm not sure if Belit is ensorcelled by the treasure she found, I'm assuming she was they way it was described, but it also showcases the typical greed of the adventurer in those early adventures.
It's like the aphorism about how fish don't have a word for water. Anyone who says a series or genre don't have a specific worldview and set of assumptions built into it is just someone who's so comfortable with them that they feel invisible. Unless you're doing critical analysis, those implicit assumptions only really stand out when they clash with your own beliefs.REH's philosophy and views on life are all over his writing. His dislikes of civilization and authority, his belief in past lives, the inevitable rise and fall of peoples, and yes, his more problematic views. All the stuff he writes about in his letters shows up in his stories. It's ironic, considering there are plenty of people that laud Sword and Sorcery for supposedly being just action and adventure, with no deeper meaning.