Ghostwind said:It depends. If those 'hundreds' of people would have definitely bought products from company X, then it would likely be significant. However, if only 10% of the 'boycotters' would have normally bought the products, while the rest are just giving lip service, then it would fall under 'fanboy flaming' and promptly dismissed.
Absolutely. I imagine that it becomes very difficult for publishers to try to determine where that line begins and ends. I imagine that many of them may get frustrated and think that the *actual* potential purchasers are much lower, due to all the noise created by people who would never have bought those products in the first place. I know I would get frustrated as a publisher trying to figure that out.

That's part of why the poll of "Will you buy from DTRPG" is flawed - I imagine that a lot of the "No" votes are from people who wouldn't buy PDFs in the first place, no matter who was selling them.
Ghostwind said:Of the two scenarios, the second is more likely and more common in today's market. Most threats of boycotts are meaningless because a statistically significant number of those who are being vocal about the boycott would have never bought the product in the first place.
Sure, I can see that. But, I think there has to come a point when you see a lot of different people complaining about something that they don't like and you decide to do something about it.
That's very hard to figure out. It's hard to separate the valid claims and concerns from the "Company Y sux!" flaming. But, just because 50 "valid" (or, let's say, "politely worded") concerns are buried amongst 500 "flamer" posts doesn't make the 50 valid concerns less valid.