Its not an either/or.
I really don't know where this assumption is coming from what Im saying we should do things one way and no other way, even and especially if it leaves massive gaps in the gameplay, and if those gaps exist do nothing to close them.
At no point did I communicate anything remotely close to this, yet every other person in here keeps pointing out gaps and, rather than suggesting solutions and prompting a discussion, keep asserting that the gaps are intentional, and not just the consequence of answering direct questions without writing an entire book to cover every potential whatabout that wasn't relevant to those questions.