RPG Evolution - D&D Tactics: Hikes

I go on a lot of Boy Scout hikes. If I were in an adventuring party in a fantasy world, I'd never make it.

I go on a lot of Boy Scout hikes. If I were in an adventuring party in a fantasy world, I'd never make it.

princess-4395983_960_720.jpg

Picture courtesy of Pixabay.

Our hikes average anywhere from a half hour to several hours, depending on the terrain and season. We have one Scoutmaster who could easily qualify as a ranger, but for the rest of us, real life challenges make it clear that out-of-shape wizards are going to be in trouble if they have to walk to their next destination.

Weather Matters​

For obvious reasons, walking in the snow can be tough. We avoid hiking in winter, but we have hiked in Spring and Fall through rocky terrain. The toughest terrain we've encountered if after a recent rain with leaves on the ground. The combination makes it difficult to see a clear path (if there even is one). We've gotten lost in places we've hiked previously just because leaves covered everything. Wet leaves also make the ground slippery. More than one Scout has plunged their foot into an unseen puddle or slipped on a rock.

Adventurers in this sort of terrain will likely have challenges tracking, finding a path, and even just moving through it. This is one of the reasons I started using a walking stick, if only to test how to proceed. Characters familiar with the outdoors (barbarians, druids, ranger) will have an easier time of it than those who are unaccustomed to being outside the confines of their hometown.

Hikes Are Exhausting​

When the weather's nice, I try to walk every day in my neighborhood and when it's not I run on my treadmill. In both cases, the terrain is flat enough that I can turn off my brain. Not so when hiking, which requires constant vigilance as you determine your next step, avoid blundering into branches, and try to spot the path forward.

In unfamiliar terrain, a hike is not merely something you do while you do something else. Characters who want to perform most skills in difficult terrain will find it nearly impossible. Except maybe for singing, so the bards have something to do (the Scouts won't let me though for good reason).

Natural Hazards​

The outdoors can be beautiful but it isn't ordered to make life easier for anyone to pass through it. Woods are filled with dead branches and fallen trees that will have to be circumnavigated. The aforementioned leaves make everything slippery and conceal holes that can trip you up. And there is wildlife that can react poorly to intrusions -- my son was stung by a hornet just walking up rocky steps near a castle.

Characters who are uncoordinated or unaccustomed to traveling outdoors may well take damage just by trying to make their way, or end up exhausted in the process.

Leave No Trace​

In Scouts, we encourage the philosophy of "leave not trace," which means you leave the terrain how it was when you arrived. That means no picking up sticks or feathers or rocks to take with you. It also means essentially covering your tracks.

Cityfolk unaccustomed to the outdoors may be surprised how visible their blundering is to beasts and trackers. When cover your tracks, getting the wizard to stop leaving crumbs behind is as important as leaving fewer footprints.

Avoiding the Long Hike​

The modern solution to these challenges is to just take a car or walk on a paved road. In fantasy campaigns, there are rarely equivalents, but magic provides some solutions.

Find the path eliminates a lot of the guesswork of trying to find the easiest route through rough terrain (a bit like spotting trail markers even when there are none). And freedom of movement is like walking on a flat road. But the most magically economical solution is probably the fly spell. Flying over a forest is a significant advantage, and species with natural flight can get places much faster than their grounded companions.

Your Turn: How has your real life hiking experience influenced traveled in your games?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Michael Tresca

Michael Tresca

Zardnaar

Legend
No dangerous wildlife in UK, though bison have been reintroduced near where I live, which is superb news.
I did have a friend in primary school who was actually savaged by a squirrel! It was pretty bloody at the time, though I suspect being known thereafter as “squirrel boy” was probably worse.

Death by feral dogs count?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Peter BOSCO'S

Adventurer
You know how to survive an encounter with bears? It's easy: Don't stop to take a selfie with it. They don't like that. That's pretty much it. You can otherwise (most of the time) just say "Hey, Bear!" and walk away.
I live in Alaska. I knew four people who were killed by bears. A friend of my mothers ( a very experienced hiker) and her son-in law were killed by a bear in city limits. Apparently the bear had a moose kill near the trail, and when they unknowingly got to close to the kill it thought they were trying to steal its food, and it killed them. Fish & Game killed it. The other two were the father and step-mother of a childhood not quite friend. They were doing a wilderness float trip in north west Alaska. I am not sure how they were killed, but they likely unintentionally floated too close to a bear and it killed them. I am not sure what happened to that bear.

All of them may have also been partially eaten by the bears.
 

Dioltach

Legend
I've never been killed while hiking, but here's an unnerving encounter I once had. I was hiking in the Sierra de Guadarama, north of Madrid, and decided to rest for a while on a slab of stone along an open stretch of the trail. I stretched out, propped my head up against my pack, put my headphones on and I was out. I woke up about half an hour later to see five or six vultures circling directly overhead.

I told them very politely that I was actually still alive, thanks for enquiring, and legged it.
 

Zardnaar

Legend
I've never been killed while hiking, but here's an unnerving encounter I once had. I was hiking in the Sierra de Guadarama, north of Madrid, and decided to rest for a while on a slab of stone along an open stretch of the trail. I stretched out, propped my head up against my pack, put my headphones on and I was out. I woke up about half an hour later to see five or six vultures circling directly overhead.

I told them very politely that I was actually still alive, thanks for enquiring, and legged it.

Meanie bailing in a dinner invitation.

Way I look at it humans in wildness are in some else land. And the wilderness starts at the beach as well once you enter the water.

I'm more scared about the weather. We have a saying here 4 seasons in one day. It doesn't get as cold as Europe but it's a lot more variable and hypothermia can easily get you.

Went swimming in the ocean and found out the water temperature was 14 degrees. Got bored and checked the Baltic (Kaliningrad) and it was 16 in their summer time.

Goal was to do these by December probably not gonna happen.


Not even that high but you can have a hot day in October, get rained on then hot with snow and cold wind/exposure.

That's on the coast no where near the Alps.
 
Last edited:

Zardnaar

Legend
1:34 mark waterfall in my city.

Made American got stuck here during Covid so stayed for couple of years.

You can hike from there to another one then up the hill I posted in previous post through to the Silver Peaks.

City is surrounded by 500-700 metre hills. There's tracks all over them. Plus the peninsula which is basically a giant hill with albatross, penguins, seals and sea lions. There's around 100 walks locally 9 of the best.


Number 8 is a favourite we go there or botanical gardens every other weak when it's warm. The other weeks are up the Flagstaff trail, Orokanui, beaches etc.

Quack.

IMG_20220918_135027.jpg
 
Last edited:

Schmoe

Adventurer
I live in Alaska. I knew four people who were killed by bears. A friend of my mothers ( a very experienced hiker) and her son-in law were killed by a bear in city limits. Apparently the bear had a moose kill near the trail, and when they unknowingly got to close to the kill it thought they were trying to steal its food, and it killed them. Fish & Game killed it. The other two were the father and step-mother of a childhood not quite friend. They were doing a wilderness float trip in north west Alaska. I am not sure how they were killed, but they likely unintentionally floated too close to a bear and it killed them. I am not sure what happened to that bear.

All of them may have also been partially eaten by the bears.

Yeah. I find claims that wildlife isn't dangerous to be laughable. You need to treat the wilderness and wildlife with respect, and getting into the wrong situation can quickly lead to a bad injury or worse.
 

Even though it's not the wilderness, here in Phoenix at least once a week during the summer there are news stories of people (almost always from out of town) who need to be rescued, or even found dead, trying to hike up Camelback Mountain. The mindset of "Well, it's already above 100 degrees F at 8 AM so it's the perfect time for a strenuous hike up a mountain with a small bottle of water" completely eludes me...
 

talien

Community Supporter
@Dr. Bull I don't think the consensus is that the wilderness is dangerous or threatening. And probably not particularly exhausting. At least to those accustomed to it. But we all can find enough stories of "city slickers" doing stupid stuff and contributing to their own injuries or deaths. Yes the wilderness is no more dangerous than the an urban settings is, if you are proficient in whichever settings you are in. Not everyone (or every adventurer) is.

But the point I would like to emphasize is: D&D rules are pretty bad at simulating real world overland travel through wilderness. BUT, the rules are just fine for making a fun, playable RPG experience. Just like the D&D rules are for weapons, and armor, and most everything else.
To this point: I think it's worth differentiating between barbarians, druids, and rangers who live in this sort of terrain, and the cityfolk who would be out of their depth. We have two elves in our current D&D game (one a druid, one a ranger), and they are a neverending source of information about the wilderness -- even when it's a foreign terrain, they can at least compare it to the woods they call home. The human (who comes from a desert realm), tieflings (who come from another dimension), and gnome (who comes from a mercantile society) are completely out of their depth in the forest. The elf druid is fond of telling everyone how each forest smells, and how swamps and mushroom forests "smell wrong."

My real life experience is more gnome than elf in this regard!
 

MGibster

Legend
Have you not read the Two Towers?
A novel is a very different medium from a game and what works for one might not work for the other. Travel in most RPGs is kind of glossed over in my experience. We don't spend two hours of our precious game time trudging through the wilderness, we have a brief description of our travel before getting on to the good stuff.

Yeah. I find claims that wildlife isn't dangerous to be laughable. You need to treat the wilderness and wildlife with respect, and getting into the wrong situation can quickly lead to a bad injury or worse.
It's not that wildlife isn't dangerous, it's just that encounters between humans and various forms of wildlife aren't all that common in the grand scheme of things. If you go on a hike in Arkansas, you're more likely to suffer from weather related problems like heat stroke or hypothermia, injuries including blisters, sprains, or broken bones from falls, or just plain overexertion if you're not used to the exercise. When I hike I worry about spraining something, not getting enough water, or overheating, but I never worry about encountering wildlife.

And it's not that I don't respect wildlife, I just don't encounter anything dangerous on a regular basis. In the last few months I've seen deer, turkeys, various snakes, and one bobcat. (The bobcat surprised me and it's probably the only one I'll ever see in the wild.) On occasion I'll hear coyotes in the distance, but they're not going to mess with me. When I get close to a potentially dangerous animal, usually a snake on a trail, I give it a wide berth and leave it alone. Except for the one time I forced a cottonmouth to move on to greener pastures because it was particularly close to a trail where a lot of people were walking their dogs.
 

Thomas Shey

Legend
I live in Alaska. I knew four people who were killed by bears. A friend of my mothers ( a very experienced hiker) and her son-in law were killed by a bear in city limits. Apparently the bear had a moose kill near the trail, and when they unknowingly got to close to the kill it thought they were trying to steal its food, and it killed them. Fish & Game killed it. The other two were the father and step-mother of a childhood not quite friend. They were doing a wilderness float trip in north west Alaska. I am not sure how they were killed, but they likely unintentionally floated too close to a bear and it killed them. I am not sure what happened to that bear.

All of them may have also been partially eaten by the bears.

Do you know if they were browns? I've gotten some indications in things I've read that overall they tend to have a more questionable temperament than the blacks that are more common in the wilder areas nearest where I am (though getting near a female with cubs or between a bear and food is never the best plan ever).
 

Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top