Breakdaddy
First Post
Re: Hackmaster
I'm with you, I love HM. My players didnt like the mortality rate of characters, and whined about the score rolling method (3d6 ONLY, placed in order of attribute). They are used to some of the "kewl" optional 3e rolling methods that tend to make characters with higher attributes. Personally. I think HM is a DMs dream, and even good players could learn to love it if they got past the initial "power down" of new PCs in HM. In any event, you will have to pry my 3E books from my cold dead hands, it still rules for me
thegolem said:I've picked up the HM core books and adventures thus far.
The adventures (B1 and B2) are great in my opinion. Excellent rethinkings of the original material, and great source (especially B2) for a campaign setting.
Either I'm going to play HM one of these days, or use the material in a 3e or 2e campaign.
I'm with you, I love HM. My players didnt like the mortality rate of characters, and whined about the score rolling method (3d6 ONLY, placed in order of attribute). They are used to some of the "kewl" optional 3e rolling methods that tend to make characters with higher attributes. Personally. I think HM is a DMs dream, and even good players could learn to love it if they got past the initial "power down" of new PCs in HM. In any event, you will have to pry my 3E books from my cold dead hands, it still rules for me
