trancejeremy said:
Well, I guess it really depends on whether or not you feel that prison is for punishment for a crime, or someplace to rehabilitate people.
Ideally, the principles that justice is supposed to mete out upon those convicted of a crime can be divided into three tiers: desert (in the sense of "just deserts"), deterrence, and rehabilitation.
In practicality, achieving all three is virtually impossible...heck, even achieving one is, depending on who you ask, rarely done.
This particular case seems to be a question of desert vs. rehabilitation. On the one hand, people aren't in prison to have a good time. On the other hand, there is a valid arguement to be had for saying that playing RPGs in prison could promote values that society embraces. This isn't even taking into context the caveat that even though they're being punished, we do not want people who are in prison to suffer, so there must be elements there to make life comfortable, and perhaps even enjoyable, for them.
Personally, I take exception to the idea that prisoners can't play RPGs. The idea that they "reduce accountability and substitute raw power for legitimate authority" is absurd. This is the same garbage we hear from everyone who doesn't play RPGs: they seem to be under the impression that people cannot separate whats inside their head from what's outside of it. Having a character who bashes in the head of the local militia and flees into the wilderness is different than doing it yourself.
This is in addition to my worry that free speech is genuinely being impinged here. It is necessary to deprive criminals of some elements of freedom in order to contain (and hopefully rehabilitate) them, but this can turn into fascism and abuse of power much too easily for my liking. I personally hope that this ruling gets overturned, and quickly.