jgbrowning
Hero
Eosin the Red said:Wow. I seem to be falling on the wrong side of the fence. As a person whose father has served time in a maximum secutiry prison and whose brother is currently serving 20 years in a super max - I wanna say "what are you folks thinking!" These are people who have stepped outside of society. We just had a 64 year old female raped, repeatedly and beaten so badly that she may well loose and eye and spent more than a week in the ICU. You want the sleeze ball that did that to someone who could be your grandmother to be able to game? You think he has "rights" like everyone else? No, he gave up rights to cable tv, Dragon Mag, and WWF the moment he began battering a metal rod against a womans forehead. He gave up rights the moment he sodomized her. He does not "deserve" anything more than the punishment that society has judged appropriate to his or her crimes. We aren't talking about jay walkers. We are talking about people who use and abuse other human beings for joy, sport, or to gain material goods without working for them.
I find it incredilous that people defend any right of anybody in prison.
These aren't the folks you want hangin out at the FLGS.
Although this is bordering on the poltical, there's also a lot of people in prison because they got caught with pot. Not everyone is as bad as your example. I imagine that some people in prison right now won't be considered criminals in 50 years.
Although I respect the judges decision, I do think that blanketly saying that "this is bad" is not as good as saying "this is bad if." Just as some crimes are worse than others and some punishments are harsher to match the crime, there are also some people who probably shouldn't be allowed to game just as there are some who should be allowed. Part of being a good judge is knowing what's appropriate: I hope he was being a good judge. I don't think I have enough information to create a balanced opinion about this.
joe b.