Dykstrav said:Rolling dice and drawing dungeons has always been a great deal of fun.
Amen. So is the time you spend with friends while doing so.
Dykstrav said:The game has changed. The people that play the game have changed.
Mmmmm, I don't know about that, so much. More on that in a moment.
Dykstrav said:It seems to be acceptable practice (or at least expected) to be uncivil to other gamers with whom you do not agree. Uncouth gamers really disturb me- I've worked with democrats, republicans, independents, muslims, christians, pagans, jews, and atheists that can get along with each other on the job (and even develop genuine friendships) even though they can't agree on anything. I've had the impression that gaming is far less important to most people than politics and religion, so why are gamers being so divisive nowadays?
I've gamed with literally hundreds of players in gaming groups in several states, now. Cons, home games, the works. And I really think this is a local issue for you, because although I've certainly encountered obnoxious gamers, this has NOT been my experience at all.
Dykstrav said:Am I being unreasonable for basing my games on classical mythology and literature instead of video games and anime? Are there any other gamers out there who run games inspired by the Iliad and Conan: the Barbarian instead of Final Fantasy and 300?
No, you're not being unreasonable. Conan OGL is dedicated to recreating the world of Robert E. Howard's stories, and is going into yet another edition. I do think that there are a range of gaming styles that encompass a broad range of gaming experiences. Some may not be for you, but you are certainly entitled to your preferences.
I do find your coupling of 300 with Final Fantasy curious, though.
Dykstrav said:Should I just give up the game for good? Or is there hope of finding players that want to make PHB characters and loot a dungeon every once in a while?
I don't think you should give up the hobby unless you find something that is more fun and enjoyable to do. I know there are such gamers as you mention. Some of them run 3rd Edition games. Some of them run earlier editions of the game. Some run Castles & Crusades. The point is simply to find the game and the group of gamers that suits your style.
A while back, I got burned out on D&D. No, not 3rd Edition D&D. ANY edition of D&D. I didn't want to play 1st, or 2nd, or OD&D, or Moldvay D&D, or Mentzer D&D, or Holmes D&D, or whatever crack-out-my-butt subdivision anyone wants to make. I didn't want to play Castles & Crusades.
So I threw together a mishmash of d20 Modern, the X-Files, Call of Cthulu, Delta Green and a host of other sources, and ran my own game. I'm also playing White Wolf's Exalted game.
Sometimes, you just get burned out, man.
Biohazard said:The other problem I've found is that RPGs just aren't worth the work anymore. I love video games and board games, and I'm starting to think that since my time is at such a premium (especially with a four year old child) that I'd rather stick with those for my gaming pleasures.
And see, this is part of the reason I get so tired of hearing the comparison between more recent editions of the game and video games. Besides the fact that board games and and video games are a perfectly legitimate way to spend one's time, the gulf between any edition of an RPG and most video games is so vast that generally the only people who don't KNOW much about most video games are the ones making the comparison.
Biohazard said:On that note: last week some friends came over for a five-hour session of ARKHAM HORROR, the Call of Cthulhu boardgame. No rules bickering, no uber-powered characters gleaned from umpteenth source books, no hours of prep for me ahead of time (I usually DM). Instead, we set up the game and had a hell of a good time gaming. Instead of twenty minutes of fun spread out over five hours (which is what D&D 3.5 sessions often become), it was five hours of solid gaming goodness. Now THAT is what I've been missing.
I'm a Talisman 2nd Edition man, myself. I played Arkham Horror, and I -loved- it.
I think more gaming groups should switch up their schedule a bit to provide for DM and player burnout, and also to further explore the dimensions and possibilities that our hobby has to offer.
Biohazard said:The other day I took out the old Nintendo GameCube and started playing through Resident Evil 4 again. Damn, was that fun. Give me THAT anyday over debating about attacks of opportunity with some egghead who has more rules knowledge than social skills.
Heh. I hear you, man.
BiggusGeekus said:I quit for five years. Best thing I ever did for my love of the game. It's a hobby, not a spouse. Walk away and take up water polo or something. A few decades down the road, who knows? Maybe you'll pick your dice back up in the retirement home!
Since I think the OP said he's already taken a year off from gaming. Sure, maybe he needs a longer break, but maybe a different game or a different style of gaming is in order.
Certainly with a different group of gamers, from what it sounds like.
Raven Crowking said:Life is too short to play games you don't enjoy.
Again, amen.
ColonelHardisson said:Plus Conan - and Lord knows I love Robert E. Howard, have since I was a kid - is far from "literature." It was purple-prosed pulp fodder, which is analogous to comic books and video games of today, in that it was designed to be flashy and over the top chewing gum for the mind. Sure, Howard was often brilliant, no question, but the same can be said of some tropes and ideas from comics and games today. And 300...I don't see the problem with this. It's embellished history, which a lot of mythology was. Think the real battle for Troy was anything like the Iliad? I doubt it very much. Homer embellished the story to titillate his audience, just as Frank Miller and the filmmakers of 300 did with the Battle of Thermopylae. And I also bet Robert Howard would've loved 300 - it's an idealized and stylized version of ancient Greece and the Spartans, just as Howard's Hyboria was an idealized and stylized version of ancient Europe.
Well said.