UnplayedRanger
Adventurer
Me too, but the older I get the less time I want to be pouring over options, and the more time I want to just be playing the game.I mean, I used to love all that stuff....
Me too, but the older I get the less time I want to be pouring over options, and the more time I want to just be playing the game.I mean, I used to love all that stuff....
I still like 5e…for a 5e game.I mean, I used to love all that stuff....
No worries. I wasn't offended.
I didn't want to elaborate because I'm trying to keep my comments predominantly positive.
While I can enjoy putting together a build, I tend to better enjoy options that have tradeoffs. I also prefer complexity that allows for breadth of play (leading armies, building a castle, etc) rather than just stacking more numbers.
I think my first experience with Shadowdark was a little flat because there were areas of the game where I wanted to take a few more steps. A lot of the ideas seemed in the general ballpark of something I would like, but just a few steps shy. (I also tried it at a time when I wanted something that was more of a departure from 5E.)
Much like how I tweaked some aspects of DCC to fill in some of the blank spaces, I am open to the possibility of trying to do the same with Shadowdark. But I'm not currently knowledgeable enough or experienced enough with the game to know which Scrolls or options might better suit me.
I feel there is value in asking others what aspects bring them joy rather than tying myself to thinking about what I didn't.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.