The post was about Batman and Wolverine.Somehow, I don’t think expecting anything called a “hulk” to be on the big side qualifies as a No True Scotsman fallacy.
The post was about Batman and Wolverine.Somehow, I don’t think expecting anything called a “hulk” to be on the big side qualifies as a No True Scotsman fallacy.
The post was about Batman and Wolverine.
Let me help. This is the post you replied to. Three mentions of Batman (I’m counting Bruce Wayne), and one of Wolverine.Could have fooled me since neither of them are actually mentioned in the post I responded to... but She-Hulk was.![]()
Possibly, but that would be a shame. As with Beast in the X-Men, I've always liked the idea of her as a superhero who doesn't maintain a secret identity, and is just out there in full-on metahuman form even while she's doing her day job.I'd lay money on them going for the early version, where Jennifer hulks and dehulks. First, under emotional stresses, and then later as she gains control. That will be season 1. Whether she becomes permanently hulked in season 2+ will depend on the ratings, the budget, the writers, and whether Tatiana is ok with the process.
Damn, I find the Hulk characters thoroughly uninteresting (sans Ed Norton's Bruce) but with Maslany attached I'll likely find a way to check it out.