Son of Krauss Greyhawk Age of Worms Game (OOC)

[hbarsquared]

Sorry about my delay, everyone. Should have a post up in a few hours.

And I don't mind the pink "K", just jokin'

 

[Branding Opportunity]

No problem here. Especially if you post here first and give one a chance to restate the orders for that round.

Even though that's a good idea, it would seem to me that it would drag combat out even farther (by inserting a "proofing" stage). Just let me know on this board if something doesn't make sense and then we can backtrack and fix it.

FYI, I'm posting the next round this evening, as soon as jeremy posts

 

[Branding Opportunity]

Jeremy, you can't move to the indicated square (diagonal from wolf#2) without provoking an AoO from wolf#3. Would you like to move the diagonal square from wolf#3 instead?Post deleted ... you'll see why

 

[Branding Opportunity]

Thanee, I had to move Alexi around a little bit for her to get a clear shot at one of the wolves. Otherwise she would have had a -8 penalty to hit, and I'm pretty sure you wouldn't have wanted that.

 

[Thanee]

Sure.

Bye
Thanee

 

[Thanee]

But shouldn't she have the -4 penalty still? All wolves are in melee, right?

And Alexi couldn't reload, since she has moved then. You probably had that in there from my action declaration still.

Also, on the map it looks like Kenneth is now right between the wolves and Alexi, maybe the position isn't the best then, if that was going to be avoided? Alexi could also move (have moved) to the top left of the map, line of fire seems pretty open from there.

Bye
Thanee

 

[Branding Opportunity]

But shouldn't she have the -4 penalty still? All wolves are in melee, right?

And Alexi couldn't reload, since she has moved then. You probably had that in there from my action declaration still.

Also, on the map it looks like Kenneth is now right between the wolves and Alexi, maybe the position isn't the best then, if that was going to be avoided? Alexi could also move (have moved) to the top left of the map, line of fire seems pretty open from there.

Bye
Thanee

I made the changes. You were right, I did not add in the -4 penalty. Position changes also made.

 

[silentspace]

Majakilar's attack bonus is +2 not +3. I'm pretty sure that wouldn't have changed anything though.

 

[Branding Opportunity]

Majakilar's attack bonus is +2 not +3. I'm pretty sure that wouldn't have changed anything though.

Ooops, thanks for that catch. Many eyes make light work ... or however that goes.

 

[Branding Opportunity]

Busy here today. Hopefully will be able to post this evening (EDT).

 

[Thanee]

@silentspace: Withdraw is a full-round action... you can only move+attack, but will provoke AoO then... Tumble or 5-ft. step are about the only ways to prevent this.

Bye
Thanee

 

[silentspace]

Majakilar is withdrawing, not attacking.

 

[Mista Collins]

But does get AoO if the wolf goes for him.

 

[Thanee]

Ahh, ok... sorry, I thought the "same attack as before" part was meant to be an actual attack, while it only seems to mean the attack bonus!

Bye
Thanee

 

[silentspace]

my post was probably less than clear, sorry

 

[Mista Collins]

as long as Branding Opportunity knows what is up

 

[Branding Opportunity]

Huh? Oh, I guess I should read the IC post first, silly me.

 

[Mista Collins]

silly rabbit, OCC are for kids

 

[hbarsquared]

silentspace - No, no bardic music. They're just a coupla wolves.

And Mista Collins, how did you like the idea of tumbling past so that Kenneth and Owen can flank?

 

[Mista Collins]

And Mista Collins, how did you like the idea of tumbling past so that Kenneth and Owen can flank?

I liked the idea. I was just hoping I could flank somehow/someway (and get extra dmg and a better chance to hit). Plus I love tumbling. It is a skill I try to have all my characters (no matter what class) take if they aren't going to be carry a medium or heavy load (or wearing medium or heavy armor).