Thanee said:
The revisions are (to me) the biggest selling point of the book, but that alone isn't really worth the price.
Bye
Thanee
Yes,
But is it a carefully thought out revision based upon the years of experience that has occured in the years since the original spell came out?
Or:
Is it a complete editing Screw-Up?
Your educated guess is as good as mine.
The simple fact is, due to numerous editing errors, combined with numerous revisions, it's pretty well muddled as to whether any change is this book is one or the other.
Of course, I've been playing/running the games since the day it came out, so I can take a pretty good guess. But I'm still not 100% certain.
Of all the WoTC D&D Books I have, this is the one the MOST needs an errata out (After all it is supposed to be an EDITIED compilation).
Until WoTC releases an Errata for this book I will ALWAYS tell people to skip it.
If they actually bothered to tell people what changes were on purpose & which were oopsies, then I'd call this a Must Buy.
This book is just one of my pet peeves.
The book exists for 2 Reasons.
1. Compilation. Combine the best spells from dozens of sources for your convience.
2. Editing. The spells are fully revised & editing for 3.5 & rules balance.
Number 2 is a complete miss.
Realistically,
A spellcaster can get a lot of milage out of this one. But, there will be quite a few speed bumps along the way; and watch for an editing gaff to open up a rules hole you could drive Tiamat through.