SRD spells are pre-errata versions

...

"I'm not sure if I like the loss of the internal references. It made it much easier to grok the spells when it says this spell is like another except."

But how much better is it for re-use under the OGL?

Each spell becomes a standalone entity, and can be cut and pasted into the relevant section - without referring to other spells you either leave the reader unable to refer to or have to reproduce every time.

It also means if I'm using the SRD for spell reference and want to know what spell X does, the ONLY place I need to look is spell X. As long as the text is correct, the only thing you need to "grok" is the text in front of you...

I'm all for atomic spell texts.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Re: ...

MonkeyBoy said:
I'm all for atomic spell texts.
I prefer that the spells build on one another. It makes them seem more organic. It also eliminates the deja vu effect of didn't I just read this spell. With references you can immediate tell how the spells are different. That is usually far more important than how they are similar.

Joe
 

Remove ads

Top