Master of Monkeys
First Post
What do you think is better, the original Star Wars d20 or the revised book?
I was wondering about which one I should use, of the two books above. I thought the rules of the old book were perfect. The classes seemed very generic, which I thought was a good thing. The classes were very open ended and easy to multiclass with. I viewed the book as a good starting place for any d20 game. One of the reason I don't like D&D classes is because they aren't anything like this. They get a ton of abilities at 1st level or some ultra good abilities at 20th level that you are bound to miss out on.
The lack of prestige classes and such could easily be solved by a supplement or two. As could any other missing information.
So... I suppose my question is, what do you like better, the original StarWars d20 book, or the revised StarWars d20 book, and why?
I was wondering about which one I should use, of the two books above. I thought the rules of the old book were perfect. The classes seemed very generic, which I thought was a good thing. The classes were very open ended and easy to multiclass with. I viewed the book as a good starting place for any d20 game. One of the reason I don't like D&D classes is because they aren't anything like this. They get a ton of abilities at 1st level or some ultra good abilities at 20th level that you are bound to miss out on.
The lack of prestige classes and such could easily be solved by a supplement or two. As could any other missing information.
So... I suppose my question is, what do you like better, the original StarWars d20 book, or the revised StarWars d20 book, and why?