Expecting More
There's that quote I love: Arguing on the internet is like winning in the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded.
A point where ol'Psion is wrong.
Originally posted by Psion:
That said, the ability does say you can voluntarily lower your defense, which serves the same function.
Rereading the rules, it says you can elect not to use the Deflect bonus to defense against ranged weapons to get a better chance at the deflect.
So. You cannot voluntarily lower you defense. Defense is static. You can choose not to add the Deflect bonus to your defense, but you can't lower your defense (pg. 61, if you don't believe me).
The example of Windu's defense given above was without the Deflect ranged bonus added in. So,
again, there is no way for Mace to deflect a Battledroid's blaster shot back at him. We see this in the movies, we cannot do it with the mechanics.
That, my friends, is a failure.
Originally posted by Psion:
Only if you ignore the "voluntarily lower" part.
Only if you read the rules.
Some more thoughts.
Originally posted by Psion:
I take issue with the writeups of some of the characters.
Hey, me too.
Originally posted by Psion:
In some sense, I agree. I would say it has a chance to hit if it would hit you sans dodge, dex, and defense bonuses vice the arbitrary "5 less".
Hey, we agree that Deflect, as written, has failed.
So, if the character write-ups don't work and deflect doesn't mimic the movies, why should we support this product? Those are two very big problems. We're talking about
examples of iconic characters being mistaken, and a major, vital ability of the Jedi not working.
And those are just the points we can agree on.
Originally posted by Psion:
Sorry, if you are going to say X proves Y, state why. Yoda proves nothing.
So, I should state why Yoda is proof that the classes are erroneous. Which I did. That he's referred to, and shown, as the best swordsman. Which he isn't. According to the rules.
And you don't have to state why Yoda proves nothing.
Hee. You know what they say, give someone enough rope.
Originally posted by Psion:
However, the movie was not complete when RCRB was being written, and the advance information that the authors had was limited.
I'm happy that you can be so forgiving with your money. I wish I could be. I'm not sure how much you paid, but I spent 40 dollars on my rulebook, rules that at least in two cases we agree are flawed. I'm glad you can swallow the 40 bucks, but I expect more for my money.
On to happier things!
Originally posted by Krail Stromquism
At this point Ive just given the option, 1st Ed or Revised? All players stuck with the 1st Ed. I certainly like the revised but things are a bit wacky here and there, typos, rules changes, and that sort of thing.
As far as Jedi go, Dont you think they shouldve just had the Jedi class go up to say 10th level, and then have a bunch of PrCs like Consular, Guardian, Master, Sith Lord and so on? That would help explain the Padawan/Apprentice process better. Once the Jedi completes his Padawan training he is free to do as he will, continue with straight Jedi training and become a knight or take up a PrC.
My thoughts mirror your players, Krail. With too many things being just off about the Revised Rules, I'm glad, happy even, sticking with the Original Rules. I wish I had known this before buying the Revised Rules, but then I wouldn't have such wonderful events to compete in the internet's version of the Special Olympics.
That last idea is a stellar one. Make a Jedi Knight core class that goes to 10th level, and Prestige Class the rest. I love that idea.