Sunder -- The most useful useless feat

Marshall said:
AoO from the defender?
A: Not according to the rules, Bows dont threaten an area. Almost the stupidest rule I've seen. Running up to a guy with a loaded bow and he DOESN'T put an arrow between your eyes? Yeah, Right.

There's no such thing as a "loaded bow" in 3e, except in one circumstance: You ready an action to shoot. If you have a shot readied, then yes, you have an arrow ready to fire.

Otherwise, every firing action includes pulling the arrow, nocking it, drawing, and firing.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Rackhir said:

Sigh, did you actually read all of my arguments? My point was not that Excaliber (for example) should never be sundered. Nor did I even state at any point that it was unreasonable for the drow to have sundered that characters bow. What I was responding to were all the people posting saying "Yeah! Screw the players. Sunder everything, if they complain they're crybabies". I dislike that kind of abusive attitude from DM, having suffered at the hands of more than one DM who took delight in screwing over characters I'd worked hard on.

I thought you were enjoying a little hyperbole, after all it's what the internet was invented for. I don't hear advocates of armies of 1 HD kobolds running around with improved sunder.


I don't know about your monty haul monk, but my characters usually work hard to aquire their magic items. I don't usually have 15 other items sitting around in a portable hole to replace "Excaliber XXIII" once it get's sundered just like the 12 other swords I'd lost that week.


Progress quest, the latest in fire-and-forget in RPG technology. You can adventure in your sleep, literally. And for the record, Terence Phillip Michael Thomas only has one weapon, a +28 steely vicious bandyclef. And he's done all sorts of things in the pursuit of power (checking list), he's delivered lunch pales and cookies, fetched buckets and hoes, all kinds of stuff. Sir, I find your insinuations to the otherwise insulting and political!


Items are not the be all and end all of D&D, but they are an important part. Are you telling me that you aren't at least partially defined by the "stuff" you own? What kind of computer you have, car you drive, place you live in.

One of the things I have learned is one of the very few things that truly matters are the small kindnesses you do for people. Stuff is stuff. It wears out, slides into obsolesence, loses its luster. The small things that cost you little or nothing, those last and last and last. Stuff has a certain utility, but beyond that, and losing it might be a pain in the butt, it's just stuff. And a person being overly concerned with the loss of virtual stuff (beyond the normal outburst that could be attributed to surprise) well that's really, really wierd. When you think of the fun role-playing stuff from your days of yor, how much of it is "I had this and this"? None probably. Certainly in my case, it's "I did this, and then remember what Tony did? HAHAHAHA." When you're done playing the only thing that's really left is the story of the character(s).
 

Marshall said:
AoO from the defender?
A: Not according to the rules, Bows dont threaten an area. Almost the stupidest rule I've seen. Running up to a guy with a loaded bow and he DOESN'T put an arrow between your eyes? Yeah, Right.

You haven't put alot of thought into this, have you?
 

Kibo said:
When you're done playing the only thing that's really left is the story of the character(s).

You've obviously never played a character who wielded a three-handed Mercurial Greatsword +2/+4 vs. your friends and family.
 

Hejdun said:
I certainly have issues with Sunder. As a DM, I refuse to sunder anything of extreme value (gp or sentimental), because it just seems cheap.

I'm sorry, but the thought of a piddly little level 4 orc fighter with a GMW cast on his weapon shattering Excaliber (or the world's equivelant) with ease doesn't sit well with me.

In regards to the comments about Stormbringer and Excalibur... clearly both blades are virtually artifacts, and as such, I can see them only being able to be destroyed through a very specific means.

Breaking weapons is a legit tactic, albeit one that the GM should use in moderation. Me personally, I wouldn't use it on anything that was truely special to the PC except perhaps as a truly dramatic moment.

Now, Mordekenan's(sp) Disjunction is another matter entirely... forcing the entire party to save for every magic item they have on them (and likely will fail unless they have great saves) is too harsh. I might consider it if the players had some way of knowing that this was a possibility beforehand and could prepare.
 

Kai Lord said:

You've obviously never played a character who wielded a three-handed Mercurial Greatsword +2/+4 vs. your friends and family.

Obviously. But don't count me out. After all, the streets ARE dangerous at night.
 

Asheron said:



C'mon say it,man!!!! Say it, ya know you want to.................say it!

:D

Like I said orignally, piss on your player. Cry-baby. I killed a PC while he was sleeping because the dumb-ass was a ranger who wanted to go sleep in the barn with the animals. There was a stinking inn next door. I said don't you want a bed? No the guy replied, I want to guard the horses from our enemies that are lurking all about in this town. Ok I said... I dared him to complain while he rolled up his new character...


Anyway when the wussy retired, he could put the broken bow in a case over the mantle in his inn. He could probably afford the rent from the local lord by selling off that masterwork half-plate he had....

The name over the door would be...

You KNOW...

The ____ ___!

Probably carved the crappy sign with his crappy craft-woodworking skill he took at first level when he wanted to make arrows but didn't know what the word fletcher meant....

Aluvial :p
 

Darklone said:


Hong, you old scoundrel, don't stop picking on this old German bulldog, otherwise I could think I could speak English ;)

Hey, you speak pretty good English. Or Austrian anyway. That's the only dialect of English I speak.


I tried to get that Dragon somewhere... still looking. But I do handle it similar though more handwaving and less rules. That's bad for the players though sometimes :)

Dragon 289 is one of the better ones since the start of the 3E era, I reckon.

I guess I could handwave it, but having a bunch of rules just make it more solid, somehow. Like it isn't just DM's fiat saying that stuff happens.
 

Aluvial said:


Like I said orignally, piss on your player. Cry-baby. I killed a PC while he was sleeping because the dumb-ass was a ranger who wanted to go sleep in the barn with the animals. There was a stinking inn next door. I said don't you want a bed? No the guy replied, I want to guard the horses from our enemies that are lurking all about in this town. Ok I said... I dared him to complain while he rolled up his new character...

Anubis does this better than you.
 


Remove ads

Top