Lanefan
Victoria Rules
That's just binary logic, which almost never applies to real-world debates particularly if more than two people are involved and even more particularly when there is more than one binary variable (in this case good-bad) and-or that variable isn't in fact binary at all. With the 3e-4e debate we have both these complications: more than two people, and more than one beyond-binary variable.You didn't make an assertion though. Sides can have all sorts of views.
The individual assertions are
1. 4e was good.
If you think 4e was bad or your neutral then for you the above is false.
2. 3e was good
Same as for 4e.
I said a logical assertion. It has to be stated as a truth statement. Thus it's always yes or no. (true or false)
I can hyopthetically make an assertion that 4e was good. You can claim this is false as for you it is neither good nor bad e.g. maybe you've never heard of it, or you have no opinion. A third person could claim both our assertions are false and that 4e was bad. Already we've gone beyond simple binary as just this one variable in fact has three states: good-bad-neutral.
Add in other variables (was 3e good or bad or neutral; were both 3e and 4e good; were both 3e and 4e bad) and any usefulness binary logic might have once had has long since been left dying by the trail.
Lanefan