the conclusion of all this struggle

[le Redoutable]

... whether a data belongs to a group or to the other, is
( for use with Alignments :
if each Class Level is oriented to a given Alignment,
say you Have
4 Levels in Chaos
+
3 Levels in Law
+
3 Levels in Good
+
7 Levels in Evil
you are of Class Level 4+3+3+7 = 17
and
at equality in Law and Good so you may misunderpret your levels of L and G
( etc )

 

[Willie the Duck]

Question: is this post an output from Google Translate? We seem to be missing the actual question being asked.

 

[darkwillow]

My conclusion is that someone hasn't found Notepad on their computer yet.

 

[le Redoutable]

booof it's all relative to the Alignments threads where some say this and some say that ;
I say it is all because some of we all ( Charlotte ) sometimes have an equal level in an ability , Alignment, or the like ( is that clearer , or shall I devour your sweet little brains grrr! )

 

[payn]

I dont want to boil alignment down to this level of granularity. I think its just right as something hovering in the background, but easily ejected for folks who do not like it. Kept for D&D tradition sake, but not foisted on anyone.

 

[le Redoutable]

so you can't believe it's all a matter of Confusion ?

 

[Umbran]

so you can't believe it's all a matter of Confusion ?

Not in the sense you seem to be saying. The disagreements of several decades past are not because people don't think of it as a system you just made up.

 

[le Redoutable]

mmmh ... If I am correct you tell me I'm a little pretentious , summarizing all the mishaps into one Mass Confusion System that I propose for all of you to worship ??

 

[le Redoutable]

Then I fall into world alignment races :
You exist in a given alignment when you place at least one level in it;
Then , are there numerous classes for any given alignment, or do we buy monster covers in a relation to monster challenge levels ( and alignment thereof )